The Mystical AllianceBoard

Salutations!

May this region prosper as long as its predecessors have!!!!

Nice flag!

They seem like embassy collectors so I'm voting no. Not that I have anything against them. They seem like an active region. (I figured people would be more inclined to move over to the new region if we start having polls over here.)

I like the idea of post etiquette Malazan Empire should help to try and keep track of things

I would greatly appreciate any roleplaying advice if any anyone might have to give me.
-Sincerely President Milton J. Robbins

Thanks!

Viking militia wrote:

Hey guys I am going to switch nations real quick, Im bringing lemon here and bringing this one to tmc

Made the switch in officers

I will say that restarting a poll and then Extending it to 14 days is a complete waste of time. Some of us would like to RP and sort out getting our territory on the map!

SUGGESTION

So you guys dont continue to waste everyone's time restart the poll and only do it for a further 3 days. Or better yet talk to each other and make a decision.

Mention

Malazan Empire
New wilhelmsland
Forestavia
Vedan
Parakka
Exotic lemon
De anglo dutch union
Gyuamno

Malazan Empire wrote:

I've restarted it for 4 days based on your feedback. If the joint council makes a decision before the conclusion of the poll then maybe the poll will be cancelled earlier.

Well better than 14 days I guess. Still wasting time though

Legislation Debate

My issue with this isnt the map poll it's the fact we had a poll, it concluded and now we are doing it again. I wonder if the poll had been a different result would it have been so easily opened again?

Even if there was a perfect map one that was super fantastic I now feel obliged to vote for the same option.

Parakka wrote:

Legislation debate

So I'm voting for map three, in that it's a good shape and can be freely edited by anyone without the need of 3rd party software and further editing.

In addition that territory can be shrunk or enlarged which adds further customisation.

The problem with both map 1 and 2 is that it requires 3rd party software to edit the map first, then place it on the "world map" which creates extra work and could result in future formatting discrepancies between one version of the map and the other.

In addition I'm concerned that people will look at map 2 and think that's a small island and nothing more forgetting that ultimately it is a continent and will have to be increased in size to reflect that.

I certainly look forward to debating the issue with others

I like map 3 but I feel like the picture of it makes it look like alaska and russia are really far away instead of being right next to each other like in reality. Perhaps we should have the map center on the pacific?

Vedan wrote:

I like map 3 but I feel like the picture of it makes it look like alaska and russia are really far away instead of being right next to each other like in reality. Perhaps we should have the map center on the pacific?

You will get the same issue if you had it that way on that people will say the american continents and europe/africa are too far apart.

The only other way is to have it set on two different realms or something. The problem then becomes why would someone in say Britan interact or be bothered / influence affairs on the other world?

That all being said I'm sure I can shrink the imagine down but will need to look into it. It was one of the things me and New wilhelmsland were discussing yesterday.