by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .2,2522,2532,2542,2552,2562,2572,258. . .2,5072,508»

Ding Dong

"In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, to contribute something to solving overpopulation."- Prince Phillip

Scum. Good riddance Prince Phillip!

The Confederacy of Beastland wrote:Ding Dong

"In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, to contribute something to solving overpopulation."- Prince Phillip

Scum. Good riddance Prince Phillip!

That sounds like a quote that is dependent entirely on context. I suppose it may be serious, but it looks very much like a joke.

Roborian wrote:That sounds like a quote that is dependent entirely on context. I suppose it may be serious, but it looks very much like a joke.

It is a sick joke: obviously, he probably doesnt believe you can be reincarnated as a virus. The point is, he was a big supporter of population control. In an interview he said the greatest problem the world is facing is an increasing human population. I find that to be bullcrap as well. People have said that for a long time. And it did a bad thing for China (they had to make it a 2 child policy because they were killing all the girls in order to carry on the family name). When the woman asked him how to solve that issue he said "uhh...voluntary family limitation" (I am guessing that means abortions, and what he really wants is a forced depopulation (forced abortions, maybe killing non-babies too, idk) most likely, he just can't say that). He was an anti-human scumbag: he and Bill Gates and all his buddies who believe in population control can do whatever they want though and have kids. It is just the OTHER people. No, billionaires and royalty want to eat 5 star meals while we have to eat bugs and fake beef like Bill Gates suggests.

*by the way, I'm not yelling at you, please don't take my views personally, I know you cant hear my tone of voice when it's written

Regardless of any opinions of Prince Philip I personally find it saddening to learn of his death.

launching my nuke

3

2

Caterama wrote:2

3

1 and launch!

Caterama wrote:1 and launch!

You can't just go from 3 to 1, there are rules here.

The Confederacy of Beastland wrote:It is a sick joke: obviously, he probably doesnt believe you can be reincarnated as a virus. The point is, he was a big supporter of population control. In an interview he said the greatest problem the world is facing is an increasing human population. I find that to be bullcrap as well. People have said that for a long time. And it did a bad thing for China (they had to make it a 2 child policy because they were killing all the girls in order to carry on the family name). When the woman asked him how to solve that issue he said "uhh...voluntary family limitation" (I am guessing that means abortions, and what he really wants is a forced depopulation (forced abortions, maybe killing non-babies too, idk) most likely, he just can't say that). He was an anti-human scumbag: he and Bill Gates and all his buddies who believe in population control can do whatever they want though and have kids. It is just the OTHER people. No, billionaires and royalty want to eat 5 star meals while we have to eat bugs and fake beef like Bill Gates suggests.

*by the way, I'm not yelling at you, please don't take my views personally, I know you cant hear my tone of voice when it's written

I am somewhat more sympathetic to his view/concerns on overpopulation, but I can see where you're coming from. It is often convenient that the causes most frequently taken up by the extremely wealthy and powerful either leave them exempted or are only a belated condemnation of a system that got them where they are in the first place.

New Kiwis wrote:Regardless of any opinions of Prince Philip I personally find it saddening to learn of his death.

I was somewhat oddly saddened a bit as well, despite not really knowing anything about him and not caring for the monarchy. Maybe it was just about Elizabeth surviving him.

ok but i launched it

fine i will nuke the ocean instead

My lib news app informed me that Biden is appointing a "commision" to discuss 'expanding' the Supreme Court. PACKING the Supreme Court, you little sh*ts: use that word instead. My news app always talks about how great Biden is for stimulus checks (printing out money at the expense of people with savings, because we have no money). Tons of that money goes to unconstitutional foreign aid and special interests (Take a look at Article 1, Section 8 and TELL me where Congress has the right to waste money on those things. Or honestly, even wasting money on stimulus checks are unconstitutional: it pissed me off, because when Rand Paul tried to have a compromise where they took money OUT OF foreign aid to make the stimulus checks, and they said no. Not only did they not agree to taking money out of foreign aid, but those politician scum stuffed the bill with MORE money towards foreign aid and special interests)

The Confederacy of Beastland wrote:My lib news app informed me that Biden is appointing a "commision" to discuss 'expanding' the Supreme Court. PACKING the Supreme Court, you little sh*ts: use that word instead. My news app always talks about how great Biden is for stimulus checks (printing out money at the expense of people with savings, because we have no money). Tons of that money goes to unconstitutional foreign aid and special interests (Take a look at Article 1, Section 8 and TELL me where Congress has the right to waste money on those things. Or honestly, even wasting money on stimulus checks are unconstitutional: it pissed me off, because when Rand Paul tried to have a compromise where they took money OUT OF foreign aid to make the stimulus checks, and they said no. Not only did they not agree to taking money out of foreign aid, but those politician scum stuffed the bill with MORE money towards foreign aid and special interests)

And at the same time, I'm still trying to figure out how requiring an ID to vote is "Jim Crow", but unconstitutionally rewriting gun laws to require not just ID, but the use of a background check system that explicitly disproportionately disqualifies black people just to get even gun parts is not.

That's where the ideas that critical theory is truly about analyzing previously unexamined racial effects or that the woke crowd is truly composed of independent thinkers fall apart entirely for me, when they feel perfectly consistent calling everything up to and including syrup bottles emblematic of American racism, but will happily push ridiculous gun control with provably disproportionate racial effects just because no big celebrity or media network has told them about gun control being racist, so they never bothered to think about it. 'Free thinkers' indeed.

You know your in the Ordinariate (for the ignorant read: special diocese for a bunch of Anglicans-turned Catholic) when...

Multiple parishes in the US and Canada publicly announce requiem masses for Prince Philip.

On a rather random note, I finally went and read Jennifer Government after seeing the ads for however many years. It is actually quite good, I would generally recommend it.

The Gallant Old Republic wrote:You know your in the Ordinariate (for the ignorant read: special diocese for a bunch of Anglicans-turned Catholic) when...

Multiple parishes in the US and Canada publicly announce requiem masses for Prince Philip.

I'm not gonna lie, I'm "ignorant" on that subject. My grandpa on my dad's side was baptized a Catholic but doesn't go to a Catholic church anymore (he still goes to church, just not a denomination). And my dad was baptised a Lutheran (he doesnt go to a Lutheran church anymore, so I dont know if you can still call him Lutheran)

My grandparents on my dad's side are very very Christian (both my parents' families are Christians, but my dad's side seems almost extremist). One time I accidentally said something about Neandrotals to him, and I realized quickly he was really offended (I implied they were related: I could have argued that they are related in the way that different races are (as Neandertals were supposedly engulfed into the European population because they could both breed to produce fertile offspring)). But I am afraid to talk about dinosaurs around him to be honest (if he believes in dinosaurs, he believes modern day humans coexisted with dinosaurs, as I believe animals and humans were created on the same day in the bible). What if the "days" just mean periods of time, and the humans and animals were created on different "hours": but he would not accept that. He would be very offended even by intelligent design

Our nature is gone, public transport is almost gone, if we remove our social policy, we can grow nature and public transport again, we fight social policy! we never give up, we fight back! support me guys

How to change flag

Lerao wrote:How to change flag

page=settings

How do you guys feel about gun control?

Kivektanna wrote:How do you guys feel about gun control?

I hate it. More guns. Not less guns.

My lib news app just informed me of a shooting at a school (where I am guessing no one had a gun except the criminal). I was listening to the 911 call from a teacher at Columbine when she was hiding under a table with her students while those kids were going around the school shooting. If those teachers would have had guns they could have stopped those kids way sooner. At a more recent shooting a few years ago (I cant remember which) where an adult shot up an elementary school, I was looking at the quote from some kid who was the only one in his class that didnt get shot ("He was a very angry man..."). If those teachers had guns, they wouldn't have even made it to that kids room. Just give them 22's. My old friend at school a long time ago told me in response to my suggestion "What??? Guns at SCHOOL?". Later, his libtarded ass told me "you really kind of disturbed me...could you imagine [one of our teachers at the time] with a gun??" He is stupid. Whether she is a good shot, that doesnt mean she is going to start waving it around pointing it at kids (at close range it is almost common sense and just seeing the gun deters the criminal). I told my libtard aunt who is a high school teacher the same thing when she was talking about how the staff was going over school shooting drills. she said maybe she deserves a raise for taking so much risk. I told her maybe she and the other teachers should be allowed to have guns and she rolled her eyes (okay. Die then, I'm cool with that). She ignored me like a condescending brat before I said it again. She said "well....anything that's at school a student can get ahold of". A student will get ahold of a gun illegally and shoot it if he really wants to and has the money. Many kids have their parents' guns at their house too...if she really cares, keep it in a fu*king safe (as they would most definitely provide safes if they gave teachers guns at school). In other words, my aunt is retarded in that aspect.

The only way the government can do whatever it wants to you is if you dont have guns. Remember, slaves weren't allowed to have guns either. They can take it from my dead body.

Kivektanna wrote:How do you guys feel about gun control?

For the region as a whole, opinions are somewhat varied, but I think that the majority, though not all, would be generally opposed to very strict gun control legislation but probably all right with some milder controls.

I personally am extremely pro-Second Amendment, I find gun control to be ineffective at best and tyrannical at worst. I'm from Chicago, I've gotten a lifelong firsthand experience of the objective failures and petty tyrannies of such efforts.

The Confederacy of Beastland wrote:I hate it. More guns. Not less guns.

My lib news app just informed me of a shooting at a school (where I am guessing no one had a gun except the criminal). I was listening to the 911 call from a teacher at Columbine when she was hiding under a table with her students while those kids were going around the school shooting. If those teachers would have had guns they could have stopped those kids way sooner. At a more recent shooting a few years ago (I cant remember which) where an adult shot up an elementary school, I was looking at the quote from some kid who was the only one in his class that didnt get shot ("He was a very angry man..."). If those teachers had guns, they wouldn't have even made it to that kids room. Just give them 22's. My old friend at school a long time ago told me in response to my suggestion "What??? Guns at SCHOOL?". Later, his libtarded ass told me "you really kind of disturbed me...could you imagine [one of our teachers at the time] with a gun??" He is stupid. Whether she is a good shot, that doesnt mean she is going to start waving it around pointing it at kids (at close range it is almost common sense and just seeing the gun deters the criminal). I told my libtard aunt who is a high school teacher the same thing when she was talking about how the staff was going over school shooting drills. she said maybe she deserves a raise for taking so much risk. I told her maybe she and the other teachers should be allowed to have guns and she rolled her eyes (okay. Die then, I'm cool with that). She ignored me like a condescending brat before I said it again. She said "well....anything that's at school a student can get ahold of". A student will get ahold of a gun illegally and shoot it if he really wants to and has the money. Many kids have their parents' guns at their house too...if she really cares, keep it in a fu*king safe (as they would most definitely provide safes if they gave teachers guns at school). In other words, my aunt is retarded in that aspect.

The only way the government can do whatever it wants to you is if you dont have guns. Remember, slaves weren't allowed to have guns either. They can take it from my dead body.

"An armed civilian is a citizen, a disarmed civilian is a subject."

I always like to lay it out like this: In the 1960s, a teenager could order an AR-15 through the mail and have it shipped to their front door with no background checks, no registration, load it, bring it to school, and keep it in his locker without breaking a single federal law.

How many Columbines in the 60s? How many Parklands?

Ask basically any person in America if they can name a single school shooting before the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990, the only one anyone can possibly think of is Kent State-which was carried out by the government. Now to be entirely fair, shootings at schools did exist, there was one in the late 80s, but there was never a single one of the type or scale of Columbine, let alone anything that came after.

The school shooting epidemic is one that flat-out did not exist before gun-free school zones, universal background checks, heck, Columbine took place during the Assault Weapons Ban, but somehow (intensely media-driven) there's this idea that there is no regulation and adding regulations will automatically solve the problem as long as we "do something."

It's overly harsh and I do not believe it tells the whole story, but especially if someone is accusing you of wanting to murder children or calling the NRA a terrorist organization or some such nonsense, you can hit them with the correlational argument (even if causation is never quite provable in social sciences), that school shootings are not just a problem that gun control has failed to stop, but a problem that gun control created.

«12. . .2,2522,2532,2542,2552,2562,2572,258. . .2,5072,508»

Advertisement