by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

The Free Nations Region Board

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .1,0621,0631,0641,0651,0661,0671,068. . .1,4881,489»

The United Provinces of North America wrote:Government has always been around. Family = Family government, rules of your household. https://youtu.be/SvbTFwXagdQ

Sure. I suppose you can say that. Anarchy in the sense that it's defined today doesn't dissolve family governments

I think I might move to the New Western Wmpire region. What do you guys think?

Post self-deleted by Asthrer.

Asthrer wrote:That makes no sense, the government is not your family, it's just a bureaucratic machine that spies on your Google searches, which is a violation of your right to privacy and its own constitution.

The government must be dwarf and should not steal your money that you earned by working honestly, in fact, no matter how much you want to "help" it will not succeed, only a corporate will do so because if it does not it would be uneconomic.

I remember hearing a phrase from an Austrian economist: “The bureaucracy exists because there are problems, if there are no problems there is no bureaucracy, so the bureaucracy is the only one interested in generating problems to justify its existence.”

That is the problem of "economic calculation" @The United Provinces of North America

Asthrer wrote:

What I want to say is that the state must exist to keep the corporate and the population under control but it should only be in charge of justice because if it is privatized the anarchist nation will suffer from a total fall of freedom.

Asthrer wrote:What I want to say is that the state must exist to keep the corporate and the population under control but it should only be in charge of justice because if it is privatized the anarchist nation will suffer from a total fall of freedom.

How many times do you have to quote/talk to yourself, and what's the problem with freedom? Misread his freedom comment.

Asthrer wrote:

Family = Family government. Makes perfect sense, school government, church government, a social club, a community, or a labor union.

The United Provinces of North America wrote:How many times do you have to quote/talk to yourself, and what's the problem with freedom?

Sorry, I have never investigated the issue of the board thoroughly, because I only solve problems and ignore what they say on the board; in short, what I want to say is that there must be a state to keep corporate and inhabitants at bay but it must be small and it must only take action in justice, the rest will be resolved by corporate and residents.

The state should not take care of another matter as it will fail relentlessly, this has already been explained by Hayek; This problem is called the economic calculation failure.

The United Provinces of North America wrote:Family = Family government. Makes perfect sense, school government, church government, a social club, a community, or a labor union.

What do you mean?

Asthrer wrote:Sorry, I have never investigated the issue of the board thoroughly, because I only solve problems and ignore what they say on the board; in short, what I want to say is that there must be a state to keep corporate and inhabitants at bay but it must be small and it must only take action in justice, the rest will be resolved by corporate and residents.

The state should not take care of another matter as it will fail relentlessly, this has already been explained by Hayek; This problem is called the economic calculation failure.

Anarchist believe eliminating all public government and little to no functional jurisdiction.

Asthrer wrote:What do you mean?

Those are all types of governments.

Khomney wrote:Just like humanity was a lawless wasteland before the advent of human governments.

Oh. Wait.

a) It was a joke
b) Look how many long wars there were back then
c) People were more concerned with finding food to kill others

Xsyco wrote:a) It was a joke
b) Look how many long wars there were back then
c) People were more concerned with finding food to kill others

Actually we are living in the most peaceful Time ever right now! It has never been so easy to live as it is today. And I'm talking about all of humanity in general. We have very low violence if you compare it to the past. And there are no wars between whole states right now which greatly reduces death tolls. Many nations strive for cooperation. Developing countries are developing at a fast pace even if we don't get to know a lot about it.
Do you want to live in the past?

Xsyco wrote:a) It was a joke
b) Look how many long wars there were back then
c) People were more concerned with finding food to kill others

That's why I linked that video.

The United Provinces of North America wrote:That's why I linked that video.

One can also link this video by kurzgesagt:
https://youtu.be/NbuUW9i-mHs

Emaha wrote:One can also link this video by kurzgesagt:
https://youtu.be/NbuUW9i-mHs

Looks like a major conflict is looming over Pakistan and India, over the Jammu and Kashmir border. Tensions have been building since 1947.

The United Provinces of North America wrote:Looks like a major conflict is looming over Pakistan and India, over the Jammu and Kashmir border. Tensions have been building since 1947.

Tensions keep coming and going there. There have been already 4 wars and maybe there will be more in the future. Let's hope for the best.

I like to think this is how the FNR would operate if it where a store, that is! https://youtu.be/yUaCQnljVmY

Emaha wrote:Tensions keep coming and going there. There have been already 4 wars and maybe there will be more in the future. Let's hope for the best.

Hopefully peace resolves, since my friend from India told me about it.

Xsyco

The United Provinces of North America wrote:Hopefully peace resolves, since my from friend India told me about it.

Utopia now:
It would be great if there was reunification of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. They only split because of the religious conflict. Why can't people just live peacefully together in one state? Why do we have borders? Why can't everyone live in a Unified Earth?

This video is really great as well:
https://youtu.be/r5Ps1TZXAN8

Emaha wrote:Utopia now:
It would be great if there was reunification of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. They only split because of the religious conflict. Why can't people just live peacefully together in one state? Why do we have borders? Why can't everyone live in a Unified Earth?

It's not just because of religion either, the British partitioned India and Pakistan. Then (East Pakistan) Bangladesh wanted independence from Pakistan and India backed them. A United Earth is a dream, sadly.

The United Provinces of North America wrote:It's not just because of religion either, the British partitioned India and Pakistan. Then (East Pakistan) Bangladesh wanted independence from Pakistan and India backed them. A United Earth is a dream, sadly.

What I mean is that the reason for the partition in 1947 was religion. Muslim majority parts = Pakistan and Hindu/Sikh/Christian majority parts = India. There was a religious conflict between the All-India Muslim League and the Indian National Congress going on for a few decades already back then.

Emaha wrote:What I mean is that the reason for the partition in 1947 was religion. Muslim majority parts = Pakistan and Hindu/Sikh/Christian majority parts = India. There was a religious conflict between the All-India Muslim League and the Indian National Congress going on for a few decades already back then.

Even then some Indian's believe Ghandi was behind the partition. Vox is very, very biased on some information. https://youtu.be/6mDsa-AqNcQ

«12. . .1,0621,0631,0641,0651,0661,0671,068. . .1,4881,489»

Advertisement