Sure. I suppose you can say that. Anarchy in the sense that it's defined today doesn't dissolve family governments
I think I might move to the New Western Wmpire region. What do you guys think?
That is the problem of "economic calculation" @The United Provinces of North America
What I want to say is that the state must exist to keep the corporate and the population under control but it should only be in charge of justice because if it is privatized the anarchist nation will suffer from a total fall of freedom.
How many times do you have to quote/talk to yourself, and what's the problem with freedom? Misread his freedom comment.
Family = Family government. Makes perfect sense, school government, church government, a social club, a community, or a labor union.
Sorry, I have never investigated the issue of the board thoroughly, because I only solve problems and ignore what they say on the board; in short, what I want to say is that there must be a state to keep corporate and inhabitants at bay but it must be small and it must only take action in justice, the rest will be resolved by corporate and residents.
The state should not take care of another matter as it will fail relentlessly, this has already been explained by Hayek; This problem is called the economic calculation failure.
What do you mean?
Anarchist believe eliminating all public government and little to no functional jurisdiction.
Those are all types of governments.
a) It was a joke
b) Look how many long wars there were back then
c) People were more concerned with finding food to kill others
Actually we are living in the most peaceful Time ever right now! It has never been so easy to live as it is today. And I'm talking about all of humanity in general. We have very low violence if you compare it to the past. And there are no wars between whole states right now which greatly reduces death tolls. Many nations strive for cooperation. Developing countries are developing at a fast pace even if we don't get to know a lot about it.
Do you want to live in the past?
Xsyco and The United Provinces of North America
That's why I linked that video.
One can also link this video by kurzgesagt:
Looks like a major conflict is looming over Pakistan and India, over the Jammu and Kashmir border. Tensions have been building since 1947.
Tensions keep coming and going there. There have been already 4 wars and maybe there will be more in the future. Let's hope for the best.
I like to think this is how the FNR would operate if it where a store, that is! https://youtu.be/yUaCQnljVmY
It would be great if there was reunification of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. They only split because of the religious conflict. Why can't people just live peacefully together in one state? Why do we have borders? Why can't everyone live in a Unified Earth?
This video is really great as well:
It's not just because of religion either, the British partitioned India and Pakistan. Then (East Pakistan) Bangladesh wanted independence from Pakistan and India backed them. A United Earth is a dream, sadly.
What I mean is that the reason for the partition in 1947 was religion. Muslim majority parts = Pakistan and Hindu/Sikh/Christian majority parts = India. There was a religious conflict between the All-India Muslim League and the Indian National Congress going on for a few decades already back then.
Even then some Indian's believe Ghandi was behind the partition. Vox is very, very biased on some information. https://youtu.be/6mDsa-AqNcQ