by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .2,0732,0742,0752,0762,0772,078»

Zetox wrote:Gazoo fully understand but Gazoo is just concern on how judicial branch is drafted.

We've listened to your worries and provided a few minor adjustments. There must be adjustments made, as this region's court has never been completely established out. The newly created judicial part is well-written, comprehensive, and organized.

Delmarva and Cape May wrote:I got crime pretty much under control, but now my nation's taxes are through the roof! Oof.

Gazoo is glad to hear you have policy to be tough on crime. You got to give tax break! So all these WA Resolutions are forcing us to raise taxes cause it cost money.

Eco-Paris Reformation wrote:https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/countless-workers-face-layoffs-reduced-hours-after-california-s-new-minimum-wage-hike/ar-BB1lebKH?ocid=msedgntp&pc=ACTS&cvid=e76f689bcf3a46d5a383d034afb974ee&ei=18

Currently, California employs about 800,000 people in the food industry. Fast food restaurants plan to eliminate all of their staff members except for a manager and someone who will maintain the robotics and AI systems as these technologies advance. Now that California has adopted AI fast food, it will be possible to disregard the $20 minimum wage. Liberals don't seem to comprehend that a large food organization doesn't actually control every single chain; rather, they make money off of each restaurant's brand, license, and the products that are purchased and delivered in packages to each site. Every single chain has its own owners and barely turns a profit of roughly $100,000 annually on average. To equal that $20 pay, all prices must increase in addition to the previously identified issues I went over above. Bidenomics x 2 = Gavinomics!

'California has seen a consistent and significant increase in its minimum wage over the past decade. In 2014, the state’s minimum wage was $9.00 an hour. Today, it’s set at $16 an hour, rising to $20 an hour for fast food workers.'

It just crazy! Gazoo hope once Gazoo with its two Ivy League College degrees have pay increase immediately upon signing. It just fair, right?

Liberal Malaysia wrote:Did any of you watch the solar eclipse?

Nope. Gazoo was very busy for that.

Sicias wrote:It was Cloudy where I was sadly

Gazoo think it was overrated. We get solar eclipses from time to time. What we don’t get frequently are earthquakes in northern eastern coast of the US.

Cynoa wrote:Updated roleplay map. https://prnt.sc/-u7LFktKCUH0

Join the discord/roleplay today! Great things are happening, and I want you to be a part of it.

In other news, Wrestlemania was awesome, I loved it. My favorite matches in no particular order, Seth v Drew, Iyo Sky v Bayley, Roman v Cody (both nights), and Rhea v Becky. The ladder match was great, I loved that they finally split the tag titles. Sadly, the clouds covered the eclipse for myself today.

Gazoo love that UK and Ireland are colored green as Zetox flag!
Long Live The Great Gazoo!
Long Live Zetox!

WrestleMania XL was great! Gazoo is wondering what city is going to host WrestleMania XLI?

Arechias wrote:Hi!

Hello friend! Welcome to our Union!

Sicias wrote:Good Morning Union of Allied States,

As some of you may be aware today is the day Eco-Paris Reformation and myself will be painstakingly going through line by line of his Constitution draft which I will attach below.

If anyone has any questions or concerns please contact either myself or Eco. You can Find me on the regional discord as Tiger Tail, and Eco as Eco-Paris Reformation, or you can TG us or mention us in the rmb

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UWml5-tS-tbnRs7yVjyY6Y9PEjpCLzjia0aSAQKndvQ/edit?usp=sharing

Gazoo already expressed Gazoo concerns on the judicial part.

Eco-Paris Reformation wrote:We've listened to your worries and provided a few minor adjustments. There must be adjustments made, as this region's court has never been completely established out. The newly created judicial part is well-written, comprehensive, and organized.

Ahh, ok. Gazoo is back today. Gazoo will review the document again.

Thank you and Sicias for all the hard work so far!!

Gazoo is sad to hear that one of best football player in college and NFL, Mr. OJ Simpson has died after a battle of cancer. May he rest in peace, Juice. He was supporter of President Trump and had certain opinions that were ahead of its time.

Gazoo will try this weekend to write a constructive remarks on constitution draft if changes are not made.

Zetox wrote:Gazoo will try this weekend to write a constructive remarks on constitution draft if changes are not made.

The biggest and only adjustment I would make is to let South Waterford appoint the Chief Justice of the Regional High Court through a fair hand selection process.

I just read a post that claims that democrat operatives are unlawfully registering illegal immigrants to vote. Are they trying to steal the election?

Capital Markets wrote:I just read a post that claims that democrat operatives are unlawfully registering illegal immigrants to vote. Are they trying to steal the election?

Yes

This is News to you?

Capital Markets wrote:I just read a post that claims that democrat operatives are unlawfully registering illegal immigrants to vote. Are they trying to steal the election?

Sicias & Capital Markets
Hi here are some sources I found regarding your comments
If you find any sources that dissent or fact check pls message me, I would like to hear your opinions! (I mean this literally please do if you find any issues, I am not the best with politics)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These are about how no, immigrants are not illegaly voting:
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-migrants-voter-registration-skyrocketing-905290261987
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2024/mar/07/instagram-posts/the-biden-administration-is-not-scheming-to-regist/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/03/06/truth-about-noncitizen-voting-federal-elections/
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2024/03/19/biden-immigrant-convict-voting/73019603007/
https://www.statesman.com/story/news/politics/politifact/2021/07/28/no-evidence-viral-claim-22-million-illegal-immigrants-voting-illegal-vote/5399633001/
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hr1-democrats-immigrants-vote/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I did find a different subject related:
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/mar/8/house-votes-favor-illegal-immigrant-voting/
but fact checking proves it wrong:
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hr1-democrats-immigrants-vote/
stating:
"Crenshaw's motion to recommit was put to a vote, and the House rejected it by 228 votes to 197, with 227 Democrats and one Republican voting against, and 191 Republicans and six Democrats voting for it.
That vote was the basis of the Washington Times and Daily Wire claims that Democrats in the House had 'voted in favor of illegal immigrant voting.' However, that was a misleading and disingenuous description of the vote.
First, on a strictly formal basis, 227 Democrats did not vote in favor of voting rights for non-citizens. They voted to oppose Crenshaw's motion.
Moreover, since Crenshaw's motion contained several provisions and statements other than the assertion that "Federal law prohibits non-citizens from voting in elections for federal office," it is therefore by definition selective and misleading to cherry-pick just one possible motivation for opposing it.
Indeed, Democrat members of the House explained their opposition to Crenshaw's motion during a brief debate. They characterized it as a purposeless diversion and "political stunt," accurately pointing out that the larger bill itself already reaffirmed the fact that only U.S. citizens can vote in federal elections. Rep. Zoe Lofgren of California said:
"H.R. 1 already prevents noncitizens from voting in Federal elections, whether they are here lawfully or undocumented. In fact, the motion to recommit notices that. [The motion says] 'Federal law prohibits noncitizens from voting in Federal elections.' H.R. 1 utilizes the authority in Article I, Section 4 [of the U.S. Constitution] to extend in Federal elections the opportunity for every American to vote. This motion to recommit is an effort to divert us from the mission that we are on to expand voting rights to every American citizen in Federal elections. I urge its defeat.""
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also found:
https://thenewamerican.com/us/immigration/new-california-law-will-automatically-register-illegal-aliens-to-vote/
But:
https://www.factcheck.org/2018/03/california-isnt-planning-to-automatically-register-undocumented-immigrants-to-vote/
stating:
"It’s true that California has taken considerable steps to protect immigrants living in the U.S. illegally, a position that has continued to put the so-called “sanctuary state” at odds with the Trump administration. In fact, the tension between the state and federal government over immigration policies escalated this week when the Department of Justice sued California over state laws that it said were hampering federal immigration enforcement.
But what California hasn’t done, and isn’t planning to do: “Automatically Register Illegal Immigrants to Vote,” as one viral headline says.
The false story, on dangerous.com and circulating on Facebook in recent days, is the latest in a series of such claims, which misrepresent a law designed to increase voter registration among U.S. citizens in California. Users of the social media site flagged the story as potentially false and rightfully so.
California’s New Motor Voter Program, established through a law approved by Gov. Jerry Brown in 2015, is designed to increase voter turnout by automatically registering people to vote when they renew or obtain a new license, unless they opt out. The state followed Oregon’s lead, which also spurred several other states to pursue a similar approach to voter registration. As of February, nine states and the District of Columbia have approved such automatic voter registration laws, according to the Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University School of Law.
(Of note: A federal law enacted in 1993 already requires states to provide citizens with the opportunity to register to vote when they get a driver’s license; the California law creates a mechanism to do so by default.)
The same year that California approved the motor-voter program, it also began to allow some immigrants — including those living in the U.S. illegally — to obtain “AB 60” driver’s licenses. These special licenses are for those who are not U.S. citizens but who can establish California residency and meet other qualifications. (The IDs also explicitly state that they are not for federal purposes.)
The California law, however, limits automatic voter registration only to eligible voters, and state officials say they have mechanisms in place to enforce the law."

This is also similar to other states with auto-registration and other stuff
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh, also non-citizen voting is unconstitutional (obviously):
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/02/21/nyc-non-citizen-voting-law-unconstitutional-00142525
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now I did find:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/federal-judge-rules-florida-cant-ban-noncitizens-registering-voters-rcna141725
and this is true but it is for "an estimated 1.3 million lawful permanent residents" in the state. NOT ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS but LEGAL RESIDENTS.
This one is debatable so eh I guess you can kinda of not agree with this one.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now another one that is on the fence is:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/150-house-democrats-vote-against-bill-that-would-deport-illegal-immigrants-arrested-for-dui/ar-BB1hFL3o
"The text of the bill is fairly straightforward, even if the implications aren't. It amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to make DUI by an alien, legal or illegal, grounds for deportation and future inadmissibility to the United States "without regard to whether the conviction is classified as a misdemeanor or felony under Federal, State, tribal, or local law.""
and
"It also prioritizes deporting those deemed a national security or border security threat."
Really murky wording but ok a "national security" threat.

But my issue is that it is for both legal and illegal immigrants and yes I know DUIs are serious but really deportation especially if you are legally in the US? Like non-immigrants are paying like a thousand bucks and have their license suspended.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Arechias wrote:(Could I Please just)
-snip-

I wasn't insinuating that I thought the report was exactly accurate. But it is a well known fact the Democrats are trying to steal the election again just like 2020, although their efforts likely will be in vain

Eco-Paris Reformation wrote:The biggest and only adjustment I would make is to let South Waterford appoint the Chief Justice of the Regional High Court through a fair hand selection process.

Gazoo believes you should seriously listen to our great Chairman, South Waterford and take his recommendations.

Gazoo will be posting shortly, Gazoo comments on the draft.

First, Gazoo want to acknowledge Eco-Paris Reformation and Sicias work on this draft. Drafting a constitution is not easy, Gazoo wished Gazoo could bit more active and have helped you all but being a Ivy League Student at Harvard is bit of time consuming. So after reading the draft and taking notes here are Gazoo’s concerns and observations

1. The word “People”. Gazoo thinks it should be replaced to “Nation”

2. Article I Framework and Principles should express the nations right to equality, speech, vote, join or create political parties and guilds and right to justice. This is bit concerning that those rights are not in this article expressly that we are currently have are not in this draft.

3. All the articles should be written into sections and not in paragraphs. For example Art III, Section 1. The reason is because some articles have long paragraphs in which is talking multiple topic within the paragraph, this can cause problems in the future. Also it strain the eyes. Also it also easier to cite a specific part of the Article.

4. Article III need a bit rearrangement. First it should start defining what legislative body(ies) are we going to have.

5. The Senate should be set specific seat count for example there will be always 5 senators if is below 50 nations; once the Union reaches 50 nations two more senators will be added; once the Union reaches 100 nations it will add two more for a total 9 senators. This pattern will continue adding two senators per every 50 nations. If the number nations drop the number of senators will continue their term but once upon next election the number of seat will be reduced.

6. Article IV Executive, needs a bit rearrangement. Gazoo recommends adding Regent sections first and then executive government later. Also break the paragraphs into sections.

7. It should be clear that Regent Imperial Decrees can be overturned by a vote of legislature (Gazoo is thinking 60% of the vote of member voting) currently it says a sufficient number of votes. That should be avoided. The constitution should be precise.

8. Gazoo has expressed significant concern on the Judicial Article. Gazoo believe no changes should be made to Judicial branch in concern to the Supreme Court. Gazoo find a bit insulting to Gazoo hard work on how indirectly Gazoo is being removed from the position. Gazoo believe the union is big enough to have multiple seat Supreme Court and having a multiple seat (elected) supreme court will cause more problem. Gazoo believe Supreme Court should remain intact. Gazoo support the creation of lower courts (Gazoo always said that) but Gazoo believe the constitution draft should say, The legislature will have the ability to create or remove lower courts when needed, this permit the legislature to do so when it really needed.

9. Election Matter article, Gazoo believe this should be a law and not part of the constitution.

10. Non concern on VII article

11. On Article VIII, Gazoo believe it should only be Regent (and not the president)the one that can declare state of emergency, in which the legislature can overturned after 48 hours.

12. Gazoo agrees with the Article X, the only think Gazoo will add is that the Constitution cant be amended for 365 day on the day this constitution is ratified. This help to have consistency on the constitution for atleast one year don’t have constant attempt of changing in that period.

Gazoo believe we should model the draft of the constitution with the one we had.

Constitution of the Union of Allied States
ACTING as Independent sovereign nations, representing hundreds of millions of our citizens and the desire thereof to associate ourselves together as a regional power, pulling our common interests together, while remaining independent nations do hereby declare in one voice this our Constitution of our region named the UNION OF ALLIED STATES.

WE, the UNION OF ALLIED STATES, by being a SOVEREIGN ENTITY, FIRMLY HOLD that PEOPLE, WHO ARE the primary reason why governments exist and the ultimate RESERVE of power in the UNION (and ELSEWHERE) and are thus entitled to FREEDOM, EQUALITY, DIGNITY, JUSTICE and PRIVACY.

WE the UNION OF ALLIED STATES organize ourselves politically on a fully democratic basis established by this Constitution for the full functioning of this region and it shall be the SUPREME LAW of the UNION.

However, we acknowledge that alone people are VULNERABLE, not only to the violation of their own ENTITLEMENT but also temptation of VIOLATING SOMEONE ELSE'S RIGHTS. THEREIN comes the role of the GOVERNMENT, which should strive to completely understand the FINE LINE between one and one’s own rights and TRESPASSING into someone else's and grant JUSTICE.

THUS, in taking the role of protecting the NATION’S FREEDOM, the government essentially establishes A SOCIAL CONTRACT between the nation and their government UNITING them in bond of mutual loyalty.

THIS DOES NOT MEAN that we are endorsing BLIND ALLEGIANCE TO THE GOVERNMENT and completely agree that the people, being the ultimate seat of power, should be makers and breakers of government exercising control over its FORMATION, DISSOLUTION and FUNCTIONING.

Article I. Union of Allied States
The Union of Allied States is hereby constituted. Its power emanates from the Nations that reside inside the Union and shall be exercised in accordance with their will and desire. The government of the Union of Allied States shall be a republican form of Government as established by this Constitution.

Article II. Nations Fundamental Rights

The fundamental rights of all citizens in the UAS Constitution shall be henceforth elucidated upon:

Right to Equality: The right to equal treatment before a court of law for the purpose of administering a fair and impartial trial, as well as equal opportunity to pursue political, governmental, or social ambitions.

Right to Speech: The right to have one's voice heard on any matter publicly. This also guarantees the right to publicly request a redress of grievances from the government.

Right to Vote: The right to vote as one is naturally inclined without coercion in any election or any public referendum. This right can be legally suspended or revoked as a punitive measure through sentencing by a court of law.

Right to join or create Political parties and guilds: The right to form or join a political party, company, or other association of member nations which exists for a particular purpose or merely for recreation. Political parties must include 3 members, including the party founder. At least two of these must be WA members. Parties must register with the Secretary of the State Council upon meeting these requirements.

Right of Sovereignty: to operate their governments as independent nations: The UAS shall not discriminate against nations on the basis of government type or on how individual nations address their national issues.

Right to Justice: No Nation, (World Assembly or Non-World Assembly member) shall be deprived of his liberty without due process of law given by the Court of the Union. No Nation, (World Assembly or Non-World Assembly member) inside the Union and the regions which the Union has under its control shall be denied the equal protection of the laws. All nations (World Assembly or Non-World Assembly member) are equal before the law. In all prosecutions, the accused Nation (World Assembly or Non-World Assembly member) shall enjoy the right to have public trial, to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation, and to be presumed innocent until proven guilty. No Nation (World Assembly or Non-World Assembly member) shall be twice put in jeopardy of punishment for the same offense.

Article III. Legislative Branch

Section 1. The Senate

1) The Senate shall have the sole authority to propose legislation. All legislation must pass with a majority of members voting.

2) Each recognized political party shall appoint one Senator for every 2 party members belonging to the World Assembly. The manner of appointment shall be up to each political party.

3) The Senate shall conduct its sessions inside the UAS Government Board. No bill shall become a law unless it has been posted, debated, and voted publicly in the regional poll of the UAS Government Board.

4) The Senate can create any new elected offices and repeal such offices that were made by 51% of the vote.

5) The Senate shall adopt rules for its own proceedings appropriate by law. The rules must be approved by a majority of members voting.

6) The Senate shall have the power to the power to impeach regional officers. Impeachments must pass by 60% of members voting.

7) The Senate can order the closure of any embassy with a majority of members voting.

8) The Senate shall vote on all WA Legislation. The decision of the Senate, determined by a majority of members voting, shall determine the vote of the World Assembly Delegate on said legislation.

9) The Senate shall have the authority to propose amendments to the constitution. Constitutional Amendments must pass by a 60% majority of members voting.

10) The Senate has the authority to accept or reject Regional Mergers, Protectorates & Colonies via 60% of members voting.

Section 2. The State Council

1) The State Council shall be comprised of all World Assembly members, who are not current members of the Senate, who have resided in the region for 7 consecutive days.

2) The State Council must approve all impeachments passed by the Senate via a majority of members voting.

3) The State Council must approve all constitutional amendments passed by the Senate via a majority of members voting.

Article IV. Executive Branch

Section 1. Chairman of the State Council

1) The office of Chairman of the State Council shall be tied to the office of the founder, as executive he shares the powers of the President but shall defer many of those powers to the President.

2) The Chairman shall be viewed as a symbol of regional unity, and the symbolic head of state of the regional government and as such shall be prohibited from joining a political party.

3) The Chairman shall have the authority to legislate via decree laws. The State Council may strike down any decree law with 60% of members voting.

4) The Chairman has the full force and authority to declare Martial Law in the region in times of great danger, distress, and cases of invasion and may rule by decree until the emergency subsides.

5) The Chairman can impose a password lock to the Union of Allied of States when the public safety requires it in case of rebellion or invasion or imminent danger thereof. If so, the Senate may meet forthwith on their own initiative to revoke the proclamation no more than 48 hours of the proclamation having been announced, and this must be done via a 60% majority vote.

6) The Chairman has the sole authority to appoint the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces and a Deputy Chairman of the State Council of the region at his pleasure.

7) As the founder is a vassal nation of South Waterford, all proclamations from South Waterford shall be treated as the words of the founder. The founder as a name of its self, Unified Waterford shall not vote on any matters within the region.

8) The Chairman cannot vote in any legislative election polls. If and only if there is a tie, the Chairman shall cast the deciding vote.

9) The Chairman shall have the power to veto any bill passed by the Senate. A veto by the Chairman may only be overturned by a 60% majority of members voting in both the Senate and the State Council.

10) The Chairman has the sole power to veto a constitutional amendment approved by the State Council. The State Council may overturn an amendment veto with a 60% majority vote.

11) The Chairman shall have the power to suspend the execution of sentences in criminal cases and to grant pardons, commutations of punishment, and total or partial remissions of fines and forfeitures for crimes committed in violation of the laws of the Union of Allied States.

12) The Chairman shall have the sole power to remove the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

13) The Chairman has the power to fill any vacancies in any office if the situation deems it necessary.

Section 2. The President, Vice President, and Executive Officers

1) The President shall be elected by the State Council via a majority.

2) The President shall also be the World Assembly Delegate of the Union of Allied States.

3) The President shall hold office for the term of 60 days following the election. No term limit will be established.

4) No nation shall be President unless, on the date of the election, the nation has been resident of the Union of Allied of States for 21 consecutive days.

5) The President shall execute the laws and cause them to be executed and shall have the power to veto any bill passed by the Senate. The Veto must be announced by the President on the UAS Government Board. A presidential veto can be overturned by the Senate via a 60% majority of members voting. The Chairman may also overturn a Presidential veto. The President may not veto constitutional amendments.

6) The President may present bills to the Senate but cannot vote in the poll.

7) The President can impose a password lock to the Union of Allied of States when the public safety requires it in case of rebellion or invasion or imminent danger thereof. If so, the Senate shall meet forthwith on their own initiative to revoke the proclamation no more than 48 hours of the proclamation been announced and must do so with a 60% majority vote.

8) The President shall exercise other powers and functions and discharge other duties assigned to him by this Constitution or by law.

9) For the purpose of exercising executive power, the President may create offices in the Executive Branch to assist him, such office shall only be valid during the Presidential term unless it is reauthorized. Any nation assigned to be part of the Executive Branch cannot be a member the Judicial branch at the same time.

10) The Vice President of the Union of Allied States shall be appointed by the President.

11) The Vice President is required to be a member of the World Assembly and has the right to call and conduct polling throughout the region. When a vacancy occurs in the office of the President, caused by inactivity, resignation, or removal, said office shall devolve upon to Vice President, who shall hold it for the rest of the term and until a new President has been elected.

12) Vacancies in the Vice-Presidency will be filled by appointment by the Senate.

Article V. Judicial Branch

1) The judicial power of the UAS shall be vested in the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Union of Allied States.

2) The Chairman of the State Council shall appoint a Chief Justice. The Chief Justice shall serve a life term.

3) The Chief Justice shall adopt rules for Supreme Court proceedings appropriate by law.

4) No law shall be held unconstitutional except by a decision by the Supreme Court.

5) The Chief Justice may not be removed by the legislature. Only the Chairman has the power to remove the Chief Justice.

6) The power to establish lower courts shall be the responsibility of the Senate. Any and all lower courts that are established shall be under the jurisdiction of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. The Chief Justice shall have the authority to suspend any lower court judge(s) for lack of compliance to the duties and responsibilities of that office, Lower court judges maybe impeached and removed by the Senate.

Article VI. Vassal States

1) Vassal States, also known in game as puppet states, are welcome in the region. They are not permitted to vote in any poll within the region. Apart from the Allied States of Unified Waterford who has no voting rights and is a known vassal state of South Waterford, no vassal nation may hold an office in the region.

2) Vassal States must be declared within ONE (1) day of joining the region. Failure to do so will result in suspension of voting rights for a period no more than thirty (30) days of the original nations, along with banning and ejection of the concerned puppet nation.

3) The selection of main nation in the region lies upon the controller of the group of nations.

4) Should a nation be found guilty of using their vassal to vote on any regional matter, they shall be suspended from voting for a period of no more than Sixty (60) days for the first offense, the second offense if found guilty will result in ejection and banishment from the region.

Article VII. Regional Mergers, Protectorates & Colonies

1) The Senate has the authority to accept or reject Regional Mergers, Protectorates & Colonies via a 60% majority of nations voting.

2) All negotiated mergers including those in which the officers of the former region will become and replace certain incumbent officers of this region must be approved by the Chairman, which in turn will issue a simple degree notifying the region. The officers will serve out the current governmental term no matter how soon the term began or how soon the term will end. At the end of the governmental term, the constitutional rules following elections will apply as such as before the merger.

3) The government of any region that submits to official protectorate must be approved by the Senate via a 60% majority of members voting. Such region shall accept the appointment of a Union of Allied States Resident Minister, the duties and power of that office will be established by law.

4) All Colonies will be allowed to elect a Resident Commissioner who will be allowed to propose and debate legislation but will be ineligible to vote on legislation or in elections. The Senate shall establish the criteria for the Resident Commissioner, its elections, duties and term by law.

Article VIII. Role Players Club
1) The UAS Role Players Club and its affiliates shall be the official role play region of the Union of Allied States.

2) The Role Players Club shall be guided by the sole authority of the United Osean Federation, here after known as the Roleplay Coordinator or their designee.

3) All citizens are encouraged to join the Role Players Club, however, they must be granted approval by the Roleplay Coordinator to take part.

4) Vassal Nations may be moved into the Role Players Club at the discretion of the Roleplay Coordinator.

Article IX. Amendments to the Constitution

1) The Senate shall have the power to propose amendments to the Constitution.

2) Such Amendment must be passed in the Senate with 60 percent of members voting. Each proposed amendment shall be voted on separately.

3) All Amendments passed by the Senate must be approved by the Chairman of the State Council first and then the State Council itself via a 51% majority.

3) Every proposed amendment shall specify the terms under which it shall take effect, and it shall become a part of this Constitution.

4) The section that the amendment altered will be struck in the Constitution but will not be removed from the document to preserve the original wording.

Article X. Transitory Provision

1) The previous Constitution and amendments will be repealed on the day this Constitution enters in effect.

2) When this Constitution goes into effect all laws not inconsistent therewith shall continue in full force until amended or repealed. The Senate shall have the primary responsibility to amend or repeal any law that is not consistent with this Constitution. The Supreme Court shall have the responsibility of determining which laws are to be rendered void upon request.

3) This Constitution may NOT be amended or replaced for a period of One (1) year from the date of its adoption.

Article XI. Ratification
This Constitution shall be presented to the State Council by the Chairman and must be passed by a majority of citizens voting. This constitution shall go into effect 5 days upon approval.

Read factbook

Gazoo found a copy of that constitution in Chairman South Waterford

Hello everyone! Gazoo hope everyone is having a great Saturday.

Gazoo want to apologize for not being online yesterday. Things are bit busy here in Harvard. Speaking of Harvard, Gazoo has very busy week this upcoming week so there is a possibility wont be online or if Gazoo is online it would be at random hour. So Gazoo want to apologize for any delay on Gazoo responses.

Zetox wrote:Gazoo believes you should seriously listen to our great Chairman, South Waterford and take his recommendations.

Gazoo will be posting shortly, Gazoo comments on the draft.

Waterford and I have been corresponding and collaborating closely on this. You will receive his concessions as best you can.

Zetox wrote:Gazoo believe we should model the draft of the constitution with the one we had.

Gazoo found a copy of that constitution in Chairman [nation]South Waterford[nation]

This is not happening, first and foremost. We are making this change specifically for this purpose. UAS has moved past its heyday, and I fail to see any justification or reasoning for resurrecting a work of writing that is so archaic and out of date. This is new, and it's being ingrained.

Zetox wrote:4. Article III need a bit rearrangement. First it should start defining what legislative body(ies) are we going to have.

A Senate and a House are defined in detail in the Congress article. I'm not sure where you saw anything else.

Zetox wrote:1. The word “People”. Gazoo thinks it should be replaced to “Nation”

I can do that.

Zetox wrote:2. Article I Framework and Principles should express the nations right to equality, speech, vote, join or create political parties and guilds and right to justice. This is bit concerning that those rights are not in this article expressly that we are currently have are not in this draft.

The Bill of Rights will be the basis for rights, and the Constitution has already stated as much and provided for a solid basis for it. Factbooks and dispatches have a word limit, and this allows us enough time to carefully draft a robust agreement of rights for the region. This is covered in detail in a section...

Zetox wrote:3. All the articles should be written into sections and not in paragraphs. For example Art III, Section 1. The reason is because some articles have long paragraphs in which is talking multiple topic within the paragraph, this can cause problems in the future. Also it strain the eyes. Also it also easier to cite a specific part of the Article.

This is simply a draft, and as soon as I can, I will reorganize it into a dispatch...

Zetox wrote:5. The Senate should be set specific seat count for example there will be always 5 senators if is below 50 nations; once the Union reaches 50 nations two more senators will be added; once the Union reaches 100 nations it will add two more for a total 9 senators. This pattern will continue adding two senators per every 50 nations. If the number nations drop the number of senators will continue their term but once upon next election the number of seat will be reduced.

The proposed "Congressional Standards Act" will allow for this. I do not think that all of this needs to be spelled out in the Constitution just now.

Zetox wrote:6. Article IV Executive, needs a bit rearrangement. Gazoo recommends adding Regent sections first and then executive government later. Also break the paragraphs into sections.

In a symbolic sense, the Regent is the figurehead of the executive. They don't require a whole section to themselves, apart from the executive portion. Waterford is happy with everything and has consented to the changes.

Zetox wrote:7. It should be clear that Regent Imperial Decrees can be overturned by a vote of legislature (Gazoo is thinking 60% of the vote of member voting) currently it says a sufficient number of votes. That should be avoided. The constitution should be precise.

Once more, the 'Congressional Standards Act' will impose restrictions and specify which votes the legislature must support. Unless there is an exception, Congress normally decides on voting processes and regulations.

Zetox wrote:8. Gazoo has expressed significant concern on the Judicial Article. Gazoo believe no changes should be made to Judicial branch in concern to the Supreme Court. Gazoo find a bit insulting to Gazoo hard work on how indirectly Gazoo is being removed from the position. Gazoo believe the union is big enough to have multiple seat Supreme Court and having a multiple seat (elected) supreme court will cause more problem. Gazoo believe Supreme Court should remain intact. Gazoo support the creation of lower courts (Gazoo always said that) but Gazoo believe the constitution draft should say, The legislature will have the ability to create or remove lower courts when needed, this permit the legislature to do so when it really needed.

Waterford has agreed with the judicial decision. There will be a few minor adjustments, and that's it. It is incorrect to think that one man should hold all of the judicial branch's authority. Unless you live in a dictatorship, no high court in the world has that kind of authority. It has previously given UAS issues. Although you are a great judge and justice, you do not need to have exclusive authority over the highest court. An overt concentration of authority exists, which may be problematic. In addition to its three justices, the Regional High Court will also have a separate Chief to handle Constitutional cases and appeals. More than fair.

Zetox wrote:9. Election Matter article, Gazoo believe this should be a law and not part of the constitution.

It's absurd that you would even suggest that. Determining the election process for each position is crucial. It must be described in detail and included in this Constitution. The Chief Justice will henceforth be appointed by Waterford, maintaining the current system of appointments, and the Chief Justice will no longer also be the Secretary of State; instead, the President will select the SOS.

Zetox wrote:10. Non concern on VII article

👍

Zetox wrote:11. On Article VIII, Gazoo believe it should only be Regent (and not the president)the one that can declare state of emergency, in which the legislature can overturned after 48 hours.

I disagree with this statement since the Regent might not always be able to act quickly enough in the event of a serious threat or emergency to the region. Since the President is the actual head of the regional government, he or she is required to act in the best interests of the region if given the chance. The Emergency Clause is well-written and permits the planned fundamental act to come after it. Waterford and I will collaborate on it.

Zetox wrote:12. Gazoo agrees with the Article X, the only think Gazoo will add is that the Constitution cant be amended for 365 day on the day this constitution is ratified. This help to have consistency on the constitution for atleast one year don’t have constant attempt of changing in that period.

I take issue with this. It's blatantly anti-democratic. This was not even done by the US Constitution. Nevertheless, it is difficult to change or alter the document due to the necessary number of votes.

https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/31/chinese-zoo-denies-sun-bears-humans-costumes

I just can’t believe this is even an issue in the first place. Also, it is a costume.

Eco-Paris Reformation wrote:Waterford and I have been corresponding and collaborating closely on this. You will receive his concessions as best you can.

Noted.

Eco-Paris Reformation wrote:This is not happening, first and foremost. We are making this change specifically for this purpose. UAS has moved past its heyday, and I fail to see any justification or reasoning for resurrecting a work of writing that is so archaic and out of date. This is new, and it's being ingrained.

A Senate and a House are defined in detail in the Congress article. I'm not sure where you saw anything else.

I can do that.

The Bill of Rights will be the basis for rights, and the Constitution has already stated as much and provided for a solid basis for it. Factbooks and dispatches have a word limit, and this allows us enough time to carefully draft a robust agreement of rights for the region. This is covered in detail in a section...

This is simply a draft, and as soon as I can, I will reorganize it into a dispatch...

The proposed "Congressional Standards Act" will allow for this. I do not think that all of this needs to be spelled out in the Constitution just now.

In a symbolic sense, the Regent is the figurehead of the executive. They don't require a whole section to themselves, apart from the executive portion. Waterford is happy with everything and has consented to the changes.

Once more, the 'Congressional Standards Act' will impose restrictions and specify which votes the legislature must support. Unless there is an exception, Congress normally decides on voting processes and regulations.

Waterford has agreed with the judicial decision. There will be a few minor adjustments, and that's it. It is incorrect to think that one man should hold all of the judicial branch's authority. Unless you live in a dictatorship, no high court in the world has that kind of authority. It has previously given UAS issues. Although you are a great judge and justice, you do not need to have exclusive authority over the highest court. An overt concentration of authority exists, which may be problematic. In addition to its three justices, the Regional High Court will also have a separate Chief to handle Constitutional cases and appeals. More than fair.

It's absurd that you would even suggest that. Determining the election process for each position is crucial. It must be described in detail and included in this Constitution. The Chief Justice will henceforth be appointed by Waterford, maintaining the current system of appointments, and the Chief Justice will no longer also be the Secretary of State; instead, the President will select the SOS.

👍

I disagree with this statement since the Regent might not always be able to act quickly enough in the event of a serious threat or emergency to the region. Since the President is the actual head of the regional government, he or she is required to act in the best interests of the region if given the chance. The Emergency Clause is well-written and permits the planned fundamental act to come after it. Waterford and I will collaborate on it.

I take issue with this. It's blatantly anti-democratic. This was not even done by the US Constitution. Nevertheless, it is difficult to change or alter the document due to the necessary number of votes.

Gazoo isn't saying to copy and paste the old constitution but to used the old constitution as model as how it is written and certain elements that the current draft is missing, like the freedom of speech. A right that many has fought for in this great Union.

The House and Senate should define properly in the sections of the articles, as you can see when you start reading the Legislative article, the House and Senate are mentioned in the second paragraph. Thats why Gazoo is recommending of breaking the draft into Articles and Sections. It is easier on the eyes and can quote the specifically the constitution quickly.

Our current rights, should be included in the Constitution. That is shouldn't negotiable. If there is a word limit on the fact book it confirm my recommendation that draft shouldn't be drafted in paragraphs but in Article and Sections. Our rights must be included. If it not, then this is a BIG NO for Gazoo.

Regarding the overturn the Imperial Decree, Gazoo agrees that Legislature can create the law but it should be written as constitution right that Legislature can overturn Imperial Decree by a certain percentage of the votes. Gazoo recommends 60%.

Gazoo has concerns on the Judicial Branch Article. Gazoo has seen how regions become corrupts. Gazoo believe the current Judicial branch has worked. Gazoo has been the best judge ever and has been impartial and fair to all.

Gazoo believe the regent should how the power with Government be able to overturn the state of emergency. South Waterford is the owner of this great Union and he is our Head of State, while the Head of Government advise the Head of State on policies that government want to present.

Regarding a one year limit on amending the constitution once it is ratified comment. Gazoo is talking here from experience in this Union, our Chairman, South Waterford can confirm. We had multiple situations that the constitution was ratified and then less than month people wanted to changed. Gazoo believe that damages the constitution viability, the government work and the consistency. If the constitution is drafted and everyone agrees with it then a year ban from amending shouldn't be a problem. Once a year pass if any changes happen it can be amended.

Dairasam wrote:https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/31/chinese-zoo-denies-sun-bears-humans-costumes

I just can’t believe this is even an issue in the first place. Also, it is a costume.

Its China! What you expected. They dont have freedom of expression.

Hello everyone! Gazoo hope everyone is having a great Sunday. Gazoo want to let everyone know that this week Gazoo wont be that active in the Union. Gazoo is very busy at Harvard University. So Gazoo will try to log in (there couldn't be days that Gazoo doesn't log in) and may be logging at random hours (when Gazoo is able to put down everything from Harvard and go to the internet).

Gazoo just wanted to flag that. Also since the conversation of the draft of the constitution is going on. Gazoo wants to go on record that Gazoo is concern with the draft and some changes are needed. Gazoo is having a bit of difficultly fully supporting the draft.

Zetox wrote:-snip-

.

.

CONSTITUTION OF THE UNION OF ALLIED STATES

Preamble:


- We, the nations and citizens of the Union of Allied States, establish this Constitution as a covenant between us and as the official regional constitution in order to guarantee the peace, security, and good governance of our region. It is our hope and our commitment that the spirit of unity shall be fundamental to the region’s governance and that it shall lead to a government that nurtures an engaged community based upon the principles of stable, secure governance, the democratic traditions of our region, as well as mutual respect, friendship, and solidarity.

I. Framework and Principles:


  • Popular Sovereignty: the notion that a government's authority is formed and maintained by the people's consent, expressed through their elected representatives, who are the fundamental source of political power. The UAS Constitution was drafted, with the Preamble stating, "We, the nations and citizens of the Union of Allied States, establish this Constitution as a covenant between us." The people provide the regional government with its sovereignty, and it can only govern with their consent.

  • Limited Government: the notion that the Government derives its power from the people and only has as much power as the people deem necessary and proper to preserve our securities, our rights, and our sacred honor.

  • Separation of Powers: the notion that government power should be limited as well as divided. The Constitution vests specific authority in each of the three branches: administrative (President and Cabinet), legislative (Congress), and judiciary (constitutional courts and bodies). This division of powers between the government and the people is meant to avoid abuses of power.

  • Checks and Balances: the notion that checks and balances should exist on all three branches of government and the people to keep any one party from becoming more powerful than the other and thus abusing our sacred rights.

  • Judicial Review: the notion that constitutional courts and bodies have the authority to review regional government activities and to overturn any that are judged unconstitutional or violate a constitutional norm. They also have a solid foundation in topics such as citizenship processing, security and safety, and processing rights, to name a few.

  • Regent-Federalism: the notion that a Regent (as conceived herein) and a regional federalist system may coexist. Regional federalism is a form of government based on the division of power between a central (regional) government and subordinate governments. The power-sharing system is designed to guarantee that the central (regional) government is powerful enough to be successful but not so powerful that it threatens the House Floor or individual people.

II. Essential Provisions:


II.I. The highest level of authority in the region is this Constitution. There is no other document that can supersede the Constitution. This Constitution lays out the foundations, requirements, and frameworks for the government.

II.II. With the same degree of acceptance and safeguards as the Constitution, the Bill of Rights is a direct continuation and extension of the latter.

III. Of the Legislature:


  • The Speaker of the House will have authority (administrative powers) over the following areas: Appearance, Communications, and Polls.

  • The Senate Whip will have authority (administrative powers) over the following areas: Appearance, Communications, and Polls.


III.I. All people in the region who are members of the WA (World Assembly) and have resided in the region for at least 30 days will make up the House of Representatives, so long as they are not already members of the government.

III.I.I. Anyone who satisfies those requirements is presumed to be a member of the House automatically.

III.II. All legislation starts in the House of Representatives, which is the lower chamber of Congress.

III.II.I. Legislation can be introduced by anybody in or out of the House, but only House members have the authority to put a bill or law to a vote.

III.III. The House may transact daily operations via dispatches, telegrams, the RMB, an affiliated but separate RMB, or Discord.

III.IV. The Speaker shall be in charge of House rules and etiquette.

III.IV.I. Legislation in the future might mandate House standard presets.

III.V. The criteria listed in the Election Matters section are used to elect and appoint candidates for all official positions of power in the House.


III.VI. Five senators will be elected in accordance with the criteria listed in the Election Matters section to serve as the region's official starting delegation.

III.VI.I. There will be one more senator appointed for every 25 new citizens when the region starts to expand.

III.VII. The Senate, which is the upper chamber of Congress, is where all legislation finishes.

III.VII.I. After a bill or law passes the House, the Senate will convene to vote on it, examine it, and determine whether to approve it and proceed forward or to amend it and send it back to the House.

III.VIII. The RMB, an associated but distinct RMB, telegrams, dispatches, and Discord can all be used by the Senate to conduct daily business.

III.IX. Senate protocol will be overseen by the Majority Whip.

III.X. Future legislation may require Senate standard presets.


III.XI. All legislation starts in the House of Representatives and is finished by the Senate.

III.XI.I. Any member, resident, or citizen of the region may introduce a bill or law, but a House member must put it to a vote.

III.XI.II. Should a bill or law pass the House, it will proceed to the Senate for consideration.

III.XI.III. The Senate has two days to carefully review the bill or law before offering any necessary criticism or remarks.

III.XI.IV. The Senate will return an altered version of the bill to the House for another vote before proceeding if it determines that too many modifications are required.

III.XI.V. Legislation that has been passed by the Senate is formally referred to as an Act or Formal Law, and it is then sent to the President for approval, veto, or rejection.

III.XI.VI. The President's signature does not directly affect the approval of legislation if it gets a supermajority in both chambers—a ¾ vote in the House and a ⅔ vote in the Senate.

III.XI.VII. Every piece of legislation is susceptible to being repealed by subsequent legislation, as well as being reviewed by judges and removed if a constitutional challenge is made to it.

IV. Of the Executive:


  • The Founder/Regent will have authority (administrative powers) over the following areas: Executive, Appearance, Border Control, Communications, Embassies, and Polls.

  • The President will have authority (administrative powers) over the following areas: Executive, Appearance, Border Control, Communications, Embassies, Polls, and the World Assembly.

  • The Vice President will have authority (administrative powers) over the following areas: Appearance, Border Control, Communications, Embassies, and Polls.

  • The Cabinet Heads will be able to have authority (administrative powers) over the following areas: Appearance, Border Control ((Attorney General /&/ Minister of Intelligence and Order Only)), Communications, Embassies, and Polls.


IV.I. As the Regent (Founder/Governor), South Waterford will be given the right power and position within the community.

IV.I.I. The Regent will serve in a figurehead role that helps to maintain regional peace, stability, and power transitions.

IV.I.II. When necessary, they will also collaborate with the regional government on domestic and foreign functions.

IV.II. For any reason that they see necessary to ensure the safety, security, and integrity of the region, the Regent may issue Imperial Decrees, which are their equivalent of Executive Orders and do not need the approval of Congress in order to be formally implemented.

IV.II.I. Every Imperial Decree is susceptible to judicial review and can be overruled by the Legislature with a sufficient number of votes.

IV.II.II. This will serve to maintain separation and prevent a monarchy or an excessive concentration of power in one person.

IV.III. The Regent will still be able to submit legislation to the House, but the Regent will not be able to vote on any of that legislation.

IV.III.I. The Regent will be able to vote in elections.

IV.III.II. The Regent is not eligible to run for office because they currently provide a valuable function in the community.


IV.IV. The President directs the executive branch and is the direct head of the regional government.

IV.V. The President will maintain the integrity of the union and see to it that laws are effectively enacted and signed by collaborating directly with all branches of government.

IV.VI. When necessary, the President will nominate officials and hold elections.

IV.VII. To manage the daily affairs of the region, the President will collaborate closely with their Vice President, the Cabinet, and the Civil Service bodies.

IV.VIII. The President may issue Executive Orders to further his or her objectives.

IV.VIII.I. These orders are subject to court scrutiny and may be overridden by the Legislature with a majority of votes.

IV.IX. In addition to being officially required to be a member of the WA (World Assembly) in order to run for office and hold it, the President will automatically take on the function of Defacto WAD (World Assembly Delegate).

IV.X. Legislation can be sent to the House by the President, but the President cannot vote in the House or Senate for any legislation.

IV.X.I. Until a super majority is declared by vote on the law, all legislation needs the President's signature to fully take effect.

IV.XI. Every open election is open to the President's vote.

IV.XII. The criteria used to appoint or elect presidents are outlined in the Election Matters section.

IV.XIII. The President must sign all treaties and give orders on topics pertaining to foreign policy.

IV.XIV. The President also has the authority to pardon, commute, and reprieve any offense or conviction—with the exception of removal from office.

IV.XIV.I. This authority cannot be used against them or as a pretext.

IV.XIV.II. Within five days, the Senate may overrule any action taken under this provision with a 2/3 vote.


IV.XV. The Vice President directly succeeds the President in the line of succession.

IV.XVI. To guarantee that high-quality work is completed and that daily operations are carried out, the Vice President will collaborate closely with the President, the remainder of the Regional Government, and the Civil Service.

IV.XVII. The Vice President shall have the authority to break any and all ties in the Senate when required.

IV.XVIII. To accomplish their goals, the Vice President has the authority to issue Vice Orders.

IV.XIX. The Legislature may override these orders with a majority of votes and subject them to court review.

IV.XX. The Vice President will automatically assume the role of Defacto Vice-WAD (World Assembly Delegate), in addition to being technically required to be a member of the WA (World Assembly) in order to run for and hold office.

IV.XXI. With the exception of their capacity to break ties in the Senate, the Vice President may bring legislation before the House, but the Vice President will not have the ability to vote on it.

IV.XXII. The Election Matters section contains the requirements for selecting or appointing vice presidents.

IV.XXIII. When necessary, the Vice President will assume the role of a dedicated foreign policy leader.

IV.XXIV. Any sitting President in the region may call for the Vice President to act in their place for a maximum of three days in the case that a Presidential Turnover Rate is declared.

IV.XXIV.I. During that time, the Vice President will act in the President's place and perform all duties and responsibilities.


IV.XXV. To guarantee the smooth functioning of the executive branch and the formation of a more flawless administration, the President will appoint a Cabinet consisting of reliable individuals to oversee various facets of the Civil Service.

IV.XXV.I. The Secretary of the Interior, Secretary of the Exterior, Secretary of Order and Intelligence, Secretary of Media and Communications, and Attorney General are the roles that the Presidential Cabinet is advised to fill.

IV.XXV.II. Future legislative expansion will permit the creation and operation of more Cabinet seats.

IV.XXVI. In addition to overseeing the integrity and quality of work of the Civil Service, the Cabinet is in charge of managing daily operations in the region.

IV.XXVI.I. To guarantee the smooth operation of their particular branches, each member of the Cabinet is expected to collaborate closely with every other member of the Regional Government.

IV.XXVII. The Cabinet is tasked with developing regional doctrines that are relevant to their field of expertise (e.g., The Doctrine of Media and Communications, which would relate to and offer a detailed operational manual for the relevant office while also allowing for freedom in work and leadership responsibilities).

IV.XXVII.I. The House is the body that must approve all Regional Doctrines.

IV.XXVIII. The Election Matters section contains the procedures for selecting and appointing Cabinet members.


IV.XXIX. It is intended to establish an efficient Civil Service, led by the Cabinet, to assist in managing the region's daily activities.

IV.XXX. Every office created must be accessible to the general public and follow its own regional doctrines.

IV.XXXI. A close-knit network of assistance is provided to the Civil Service to aid in granting flexibility and autonomy in their work.

IV.XXXII. The Civil Service shall have direct direction, oversight, and control over regional extension networks like a Discord server, other offsite affiliations like a website or forum, media affiliations like social media, and even other regional affiliations like the Regional League or UASClub.

IV.XXXIII. The procedure described in the relevant regional doctrine of that office can be used to appoint all basic members of the Civil Service to their positions.

V. Of the Judicial:


  • The Chief Justice will have authority (administrative powers) over the following areas: Appearance, Border Control, Communications, and Polls.


V.I. As the highest court in the region, the Regional High Court will be the Criminal Court, Supreme Court, and Court of Appeals.

V.II. There will be three judges on the court in question, and they will work closely together to rotate cases among themselves and divide the workload.

V.III. In order to establish an impartial appeals process, the Chief Justice—one more judge—will only be able to preside over appeals and cases pertaining to constitutional issues rather than criminal cases.

V.IV. The Chief Justice will be appointed by the Regent for a term of no less than two years.

V.V. The Election Matters section lays out the standards by which justices on the Regional High Court are appointed or elected.

V.VI. Every criminal case shall include a jury pool made up of at least five citizens who must be as impartial as feasible.

V.VI.I. To determine guilt or innocence in criminal proceedings, a party must receive at least 50%+1 of the jury's vote.

V.VI.II. A bench trial led by the three judges will expedite all cases and trials but will not require a jury to decide a case's outcome.

V.VI.III. Anyone can elect to forgo their right to a jury trial in favor of this option.

V.VII. It is possible to keep criminal and civil cases apart through legislation, the creation of a Penal Code, or other such actions.


V.VIII. For all civil regional proceedings, the Regional Low Court will act as the Civil Court.

V.IX. The court in question will consist of two judges who will collaborate closely to share the burden and rotate cases amongst themselves.

V.X. Future legislation may allow for the election of both civil court judges.

V.XI. A public jury pool, drawn from at least five nations in the region, will sit for all civil proceedings, with the goal of selecting the least prejudiced jurors.

V.XI.I. In civil proceedings, a party must receive at least 50% of the vote from the jury in order for their side to be declared at fault.

V.XI.II. Anyone can choose to forgo their right to a jury trial in favor of a bench trial conducted by both judges, which will speed up all cases and trials but eliminate the need for a jury to vote on a case's outcome.

V.XII. Legislation, the establishment of a Penal Code, or similar measures may separate civil and criminal matters.


V.XIII. Regional laws and norms may establish additional courts, such as Inferior Courts or Tribunals.

V.XIV. Any constituted Inferior Court or Tribunal shall be regarded as the lowest judicial authority in the region and shall only be subject to cases involving military operations, espionage operations, or other low-level subjections necessitating the handling of the particular matter by an Inferior Court.

V.XV. Inferior Courts and Tribunals will decide cases in the same manner as a regular trial.

V.XVI. Their benches may consist of a Judicial Panel, which is composed of several judges, or a direct Private Jury, which is composed of several local citizens.

V.XVII. The Regional High Court shall have direct oversight and command over all Inferior Courts and Tribunals.


V.XVIII. Anyone can ask the judiciary to consider a disagreement or legal query.

V.XIX. Judges are prohibited from carrying out any legislative or executive action that may jeopardize the judiciary's independence, impartiality, or integrity.

V.XX. A judge must recuse themselves from a case when they have a conflict of interest.

V.XX.I. Two other judges have the authority to order a judge to recuse themselves if they have a reasonable suspicion that there is a conflict of interest.

V.XX.II. If a party or their representative has a good faith opinion that there is a conflict of interest, they may ask the judge to disqualify themselves from the case.

V.XX.III. The judge in question or two other judges have the option to grant the recusal motion.

V.XXI. Courts with lower jurisdiction are bound by the rulings of courts with superior authority.

V.XXII. In addition, the Chief Justice will preside over the judiciary, manage the Regional High Court's operations, and guarantee that all cases are carried out in a timely, judicial, and ordered way.

V.XXIII. In order to preserve the balance of power, all judges and justices will continue to be impartial by casting their votes in private via telegram to the Regent for any and all public elections.


  • Jurisdiction of the Regional High Court: The Regional High Court will be the highest court in the region, possessing ultimate appellate authority. The decisions rendered by the Regional High Court are final and enforceable. The following legal authorities will be available to the Regional High Court: Original jurisdiction over criminal cases, matters involving government bodies or between government members; Appellate jurisdiction over appeals from all judgments, decrees, orders, and sentences rendered by any regional court or judicial body; and Advisory jurisdiction over requests for an advisory opinion from the Regional High Court regarding significant legal issues that have arisen or are very likely to arise and for which standard legal advice is probably insufficient.

  • Jurisdiction of the Regional Low Court: With the highest civil power in the region, the Regional Low Court will be the second highest court. Every ruling made by the Regional Low Court has the ability to be directly altered or overturned and is appealable to the Regional High Court. The Regional Low Court shall have original jurisdiction over civil cases, no direct appellate jurisdiction, and advisory jurisdiction over requests for an advisory opinion from the Regional Low Court concerning major civil issues that have arisen or are very likely to arise and for which conventional legal advice is probably insufficient.

  • Jurisdiction of the Inferior Courts and Tribunals: The Inferior Courts and Tribunals will have the least authority over cases in the region. Every decision rendered by the Inferior Courts and Tribunals may be appealed to and directly changed by the Regional High Court. Original jurisdiction over military, spy, and foreign affairs cases (particularly those involving embassies, ambassadors, envoys, diplomats, or treaties) shall belong to the Inferior Courts and Tribunals. There will be no direct appellate jurisdiction, and the Inferior Courts and Tribunals shall have advisory jurisdiction over requests for an advisory opinion regarding significant military, spy, or foreign issues that have arisen or are very likely to arise and for which traditional legal advice is probably insufficient.

VI. Election Matters:


VI.I. All officially recognized and processed citizens residing in the region (who are not already members of the government) for at least 30 days who are also members of the WA will comprise the House of Representatives.

VI.I.I. With the exception of the Speaker and Party Chair roles, no members of the House are chosen by election.

VI.II. Every three months, candidates for all elected offices in the House should run for office again.

VI.III. The Majority and Minority Speakers will be chosen from a list provided by their respective parties.

VI.III.I. The candidates will be chosen by public polling via the RCV voting system, and if no candidate receives 50% or more of the vote in the first round, there will be a runoff.

VI.III.II. The Majority Speaker will be chosen from among the candidates who receive the most votes.

VI.III.III. The Minority Speaker will be chosen from among the candidates in the opposition party who received the second-most votes.

VI.IV. The Party Chair positions are chosen according to their party's standards and preferences.

VI.V. Within their faction of the party or wing of the House, these can be localized positions like Party Whip, who represents their party and gives the House a voice of leadership, or Committee Chairmans, who represent their party and give the House a voice in a particular area of legislation, like foreign policy.

VI.VI. Every political party in the region is allowed to establish its own guidelines and procedures for choosing which candidates to run for office or select to be Party-Line Positions.


VI.VII. There will be 5 senators in the region at first, and that number will rise by 1 for every 25 new citizens.

VI.VII.I. As long as they have been citizens of the region for at least 30 days, and are not already a member of the regional government outside of the House of Representatives, anyone may run for the Senate.

VI.VIII. Every four months, there should be a senate election in order to permit three terms of office annually.

VI.IX. Each candidate will be chosen from a list that each of the parties has provided.

VI.X. Voting will be conducted using the Hare Quota System, and in the event that two or more candidates tie, a runoff will determine the winner based on a majority of votes.

VI.XI. A special election may be held as more senators are added, or the President may name a temporary replacement to serve until the following election
cycle.

VI.XII. The Senate will have roles and leadership positions based on committees, with a Majority Whip and a Minority Whip, who are equivalent to a Majority Leader and a Minority Leader, holding positions of power.

VI.XII.I. The candidate put up by the party with the most votes will become the Majority Whip of the Senate, while the candidate with the second-highest votes will become the Minority Whip.

VI.XII.II. The Whips will be chosen by Senate-only private voting.

VI.XIII. Senate-established guidelines are permissible for committee formation and operation, and committee chairmen will adhere to the same guidelines.

VI.XIV. It is permissible for each political party in the region to set up its own policies and processes for selecting candidates to run for office or pick a Whip.


VI.XV. Until the Regent CTE's (ceases to exist), South Waterford will retain executive control over the region through the Regent (Founder) role.

VI.XV.I. The Regent (Founder) is at liberty to choose their own successor or successors for the region, to assume leadership in their place in the case of their CTE, removal from office, or ultimate retirement.

VI.XVI. In order to be eligible to run for President and Vice President, candidates must be members of the World Assembly (WA), have resided in the region for 100 days or longer, and officially announce their candidacies (either through party nomination or by formally gathering the signatures of at least 15 other regional nations).

VI.XVI.I. Every election season, or every six months, a public poll will be used to choose the winner of the presidency.

VI.XVI.II. In order for a President to be elected, 50%+1 of the region must vote in their support.

VI.XVI.III. Should there be a tie between two candidates, runoffs may be held.

VI.XVI.IV. The political party running their ticket will select and ratify their Vice Presidential candidate.

VI.XVII. The President will designate all major leadership positions in the Cabinet, and the Senate will need to vote by a majority of 50%+1 in order to approve them.

VI.XVIII. The Regent (in the case that the President is incapable) or the President will convene special elections or appoint temporary replacements to fill any executive positions that become vacant for any reason, until the holding of a formal election or confirmation of appointment.


VI.XIX. A group of Justices, chosen by the President and confirmed by the Senate with a 50%+1 majority, preside over the Regional High Court.

VI.XX. Every Justice is appointed for a regional life term, which is equivalent to two years unless they explicitly choose to retire or step down earlier.

VI.XXI. Other judicial positions, such as those of Judges for Civil Courts, Inferior Courts, and Tribunals, may be elected by a straightforward process outlined by relevant legislation.

VI.XXII. Since the Attorney General of the region is effectively a member of the Cabinet/Civil Service, their appointment by the President will require approval by a 50%+1 majority in the Senate.

VI.XXIII. If a judicial post becomes available in the region, the President may appoint a temporary replacement to hold the post until a formal election or confirmation of appointment can take place.


VI.XXIV. The formalized procedure of retiring from office is codified and official after the term limit or desired resignation from office upon completion of a full term.

VI.XXIV.I. Every retirement must be made clear, recorded, and publicized.

VI.XXV. Any official (except the Regent) may be removed from office by the basic requirement of popular support exceeding a public quota of 50%+1; moreover, a 2/3 majority vote in the Senate and a 50%+1 vote in the House.

VI.XXVI. The Regional High Court is to formally handle and supervise recalls.

VI.XXVI.I. If a formal recall occurs, a special election needs to be held promptly thereafter.

VI.XXVI.II. Until then, the Regent may choose a suitable replacement for the post, which must then be confirmed by the Senate with a simple majority of 50%.

VI.XXVI.II. The special election date must fall within a three-month window of the next elections.

VI.XXVII. Early leaves of absence from position, irrespective of the cause, should be treated under the same guidelines as those that apply after an official recall passes.

VII. Interregional Affairs & Treaties:


- The power to formulate and implement a foreign policy for the entire region is vested in the Executive, with Congress having the authority to ratify and safeguard it. Anytime is acceptable to alter the foreign policy. When deciding on and enacting a new foreign policy for the region, the fundamental principles of pacifism, net neutrality, and good relations are crucial.


- All treaties between our region and other regions are hereby established as officially protected statutes. Treaties are designed to promote better relations and guarantee the peace and integrity of our region and other regions. Developing and maintaining relationships with other regions is essential to Nation-States' foreign policy. Treaties should be drafted using a template and adhere to congressional standards that can be outlined by legislation.


- The Interregional Initiative, or IR-Initiative, is an organization committed to making sure that our region forges safe connections with other important regions that share our interests and relationships. From now on, the other regions that have been selected to join the IR-Initiative will be officially referred to as cousin-regions of the Union of Allied States. The IR-Initiative (which is under the direction of the Foreign Affairs Committee) is exclusively under the control of the Senate. Formal laws can further secure the IR-Initiative's future by defining goals, providing examples, and outlining what it will accomplish.


- The Regional League is a civil service body that collaborates with other regions to coordinate efforts, organize, and oversee the periodic NationStates events. These consist of the following: Z-Day, N-Day, the World Fair. There is no need for legislation regarding the Regional League because the civil service is the only entity with executive responsibility over them. It is strongly advised to create a template or simple document that outlines the events and describes how they will take place.


- The Union of Allied States (UAS) formally acknowledges that it lacks a military and has no desire to safeguard other regions. A proper response to raids and significant outside threats to UAS is to establish a Regional Militia, which will have restricted authority and be authorized solely by congressional law. One fundamental idea that this Constitution protects is pacifism and net neutrality between the Union of Allied States and other regions.

VIII. Supplemental Provisions:


VIII.I. When the region is under grave and immediate threat or when the proper functioning of government is significantly disrupted, the Regent or President may declare a State of Emergency (which shall originally last for a period of 48-hours).

VIII.I.I. This may be suspended by the High Court, a 4/5 vote of the Cabinet, or a 2/3 vote in the Senate.

VIII.I.II. An extension may be provided by Senatorial Action to provide 5 more days.

VIII.II. In order to restore the peace, welfare, good governance, and proper operation of the region, the declaring party shall adopt all reasonable, suitable, and proportionate measures during a State of Emergency, including suspending sections of the Constitution or other legislation.

VIII.III. There shall be no interference with the Regent's authority or the Courts' capacity to undertake judicial review.

VIII.IV. Additional legislation may be used to impose plans, restrictions, and exceptions.


VIII.V. Every citizen is free to create, join, or quit a political party.

VIII.VI. A party's membership does not confer any advantages over non-participation.

VIII.VII. Laws may be passed that address the formation, operation, dissolution, and regulation of political parties.

VIII.VIII. Political parties are limited to using party members as second candidates in Senate and Presidential elections.


VIII.IX. This Constitution requires a quorum of 50%+1 to be passed, and it is anticipated that a peaceful handover of power will occur as a result.

VIII.IX.I. This concept is further safeguarded by the signatures at the bottom.

VIII.X. Direct elections are anticipated to be followed by a three-month peaceful transition of power from the previous government to the new one established by this Constitution.

VIII.XI. The same assumption applies in the event that a new regional constitution—or something similar—is passed in the future.

IX. Supporting Links:


🔗 Link to the Bill of Rights (Amendments) [☑️]

🔗 Link to the Congressional Standards Act []

🔗 Link to the Presidential Standards Act []

🔗 Link to the Judicial Standards Act []

🔗 Link to the Line of Succession Act []

🔗 Link to the Penal Code (Criminal & Civil Code Act) []

🔗 Link to the Regional Militia Act []

🔗 Link to the Political Parties Act []

🔗 Link to the Regional Emergency Act []

X. Revisions:


X.I. It is permissible to revise this constitution.

X.II. For the purposes of this constitution, revisions are the officially defined and continuous legal modifications that must be made after completing the formal procedures.

X.III. Any revisions made are subject to challenge by any constitutional court or body, and the specific modifications brought about by revisions are outlined in more detail in their definitions.

X.IV. The sole method available to add modifications and/or modify already-existing ones is the express procedure of Congress.

X.IV.I. Under the express procedure, a formal proposal to revise (amend) the constitution is made and debated in the House in accordance with standard legislative procedure.

X.IV.II. For the revision to be formally adopted, it needs to pass the House by a simple majority (more than 3/5 of the vote), and the Senate must then approve it by a 2/3 majority.

X.V. Every revision will result in the explicit removal of previous sections of the constitution where they directly apply.

X.V.I. The new wording will be inserted while the previous text is subtly removed using the strike code.

X.V.II. Every change will have a distinct, clickable link section that will let you read the House's formal disposition and get all the details about how the revision was processed.

Appendix:


- The requisite public vote must receive at least 50% of the vote in order for this Constitution to be certified, and an additional vote from one person will be required for it to pass. This process is known as the 50%+1 coefficient rule. To help ensure stability and a smooth transition into a new era under this Constitution, all members of the ex-parte government have been requested to sign this new regional agreement.

.

.

Read dispatch

This is what it looks like spaced out in dispatch format. It will not be able to fit a series of rights into it. Read section II.

South Waterford will be reaching out to you shortly, Mr. Zetox.

The new regional flag is my favorite out of all the ones I've seen.

Liberal Malaysia wrote:The new regional flag is my favorite out of all the ones I've seen.

Hand-picked by our Regent! /:)

As I was reading the link to the Guardian article about fake bears that Dairasam posted, I couldn't help but click on a couple of other links on the page. The Guardian is pushing a woke, pro-Muslim agenda like the traitors that they are. They are:

1. Siding with those who are cheering on the deaths of Jews and the destruction of Israel: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/14/no-one-dared-to-do-anything-palestinians-react-to-irans-attack-on-israel)
2. Twisting Trump's words and policies, falsely characterizing his foreign policy as "chaotic": https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/14/trump-iran-response-israel)
3. Pushing a radical feminist agenda by obfuscating the fact that women track athletes have several different outfits to choose from: https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2024/apr/13/nike-olympic-track-and-field-uniforms-women-sexism
4. And siding with Muslims who are experiencing in India exactly what they've been doing to us here in Malaysia: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/14/i-was-told-id-be-killed-if-i-didnt-leave-himalayan-state-is-a-testing-ground-for-modis-nationalism

It's pretty clear that many of these articles were written by far-left ideologues and vetted by DEI-approved "experts" on Islam and Israel. The Guardian is part of a treacherous fifth column that is hell-bent on destroying Western civilization and handing the world over to far-right Muslim supremacists on a silver platter. They are an existential threat to people like me. When was the last time they did a piece on the plight of non-Muslims in Malaysia who have had their shops ransacked for selling Allah-branded socks, and their homes surrounded by angry Muslim mobs because they defended the shopkeepers on social media? The Guardian and other far-left rags simply don't give a flying f*ck about people like us. They can all go to hell.

Anyone who cheers on Israel's enemies or defends Muslim extremism deserves to reap what they sow, especially the Iranian genocidal death cult regime and the so-called "indigenous" inhabitants of Gaza and Judea & Samaria, whose very claim of nationhood is an antisemitic slur and an affront to the native Jewish people of Israel. After Oct. 7, I support everything the BJP is doing to Muslims in India and everything the IDF is doing to Muslims in Gaza and elsewhere, or at the very least, I won't complain in the slightest. The majority Muslims in my country seek to terrorize non-Muslims like us. They seek to exterminate us culturally and physically. We have every right to defend ourselves and retaliate accordingly, far-left misinformation be damned.

Yet again, I have been told IRL that my right-wing political views, especially about the Middle East, Islam and Israel, and my legitimate grievances, both personal and political, constitute "evidence of mental illness", that I am "talking nonsense", and that there is "something wrong with me". I am being gaslit by persons close to me who disingenuously claim that I'm the bad guy and the crazy one simply for having the temerity to set boundaries and enforce them. My only crime was to grow up and gradually learn to smell the bullsh*t from a mile away. They underestimate my uncanny ability to detect manipulative behavior.

I will not back down and I will not apologize. If anything, I intend to double down no matter how much they yell at me, belittle me with vile ad hominems or try to shame me into changing my mind about anything. They don't get to use my autism against me. Yes, I finally found out from them that I am indeed mildly autistic, although I have a MENSA-confirmed genius-level IQ. All these years, my autism has been used against me by those closest to me to justify not taking me seriously, and I was kept in the dark all these years when I had every right to know, even though I had my suspicions. What makes them any different than the very people who are labeling Greta Thunberg as "mentally ill" simply for being autistic? They are no better. And I don't even like Greta in the slightest. She's either very naive like I was at her age, or she's evil, and she's full of sh*t. But "mentally ill" she isn't. At least be fair. Now I know for a FACT that I'm being gaslit, even by those I trusted the most. Now I know for a fact that people in general are not to be trusted and that everyone should be treated with suspicion.

I have been told that I am deeply intolerant. Yes, I am intolerant. I'm intolerant of bullsh*t. I'm intolerant of being emotionally manipulated, gaslit and guilt-tripped repeatedly by bad faith actors my entire life. Yes, I'm intolerant of people talking over me, shouting me down, interrupting me, then claiming that I'm the one who's trying to silence them and interrupt them. Yes, I'm intolerant of getting screwed over and over, especially by those closest to me. Yes, I have every right to be angry and upset. No, I'm not losing my temper for "no reason". They had it coming all these years. No, I am not crazy to feel this way. Everything that I have done and said in recent years is perfectly normal and I am perfectly entitled to my opinions no matter what anyone says. I will not be silenced or gaslit. I am absolutely right to be as paranoid as I am.

I'm not going to name names, but if they ever read this, they know who they are and they should hang their heads in shame. It is they who owe me an apology, not the other way around. As for me, I am proud of who I am and what I believe and I will continue to hold my head high no matter what others say.

«12. . .2,0732,0742,0752,0762,0772,078»

Advertisement