by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

WA Delegate (non-executive): The Theocracy of Aawia (elected )

Founder: The Christian Democratic Nation of Culture of Life

Last WA Update:

World Factbook Entry

RIGHT TO LIFE is a community of nations that recognizes and promotes defense of the unalienable rights of the unborn. The nations of this region oppose induced abortion in all or most cases.

World Assembly members are required to endorse the President: Aawia.



  1. 1

    Region of Right to Life

    MetaReference by Culture of Life . 2,460 reads.

Embassies: Pro Life International, Catholic, Coalition of Catholic States, Republic of Conservative Nations, United Empire of Islam, The Allied States, Antarctic Oasis, Conservative League, Libertatem, The Universal Allegiance, Arda en Estel, Grand Central, The Western Isles, League of Christian Nations, The Great American Union, Israel, and 147 others.Vatican II, Eastern Roman Empire, The Allied Republics, Virtual Roman Catholic Church, Saint Margaret Mary, Vatican, Jerusalem, Alabama, Concordia, Republicans, The SOP, Freedom and Justice Alliance, Christianity, Union of Nationalists, The Republic Nations, Ivory Tower, The Illuminati, United States of America, The Royal Imperial Directorate, Truangel Christian Fellowship, The Virtual Roman Catholic Church, The Catholic Church, Arconian Empire, Hollow Point, The Savage Garden, Avadam Inn, Galactic Imperium, Zentari, ACA, U R N, Australialia, Time for Britain 2 Leave the EU, Paradise, Donald Trump, Solar Alliance, The Doctor Who Universe, United Imperial Union, Oceania, Holy Lands, Groland, Brasil, The Christian Communist Union, Chile, Imperial Russian Empire, Yarnia, The Unified Christians Alliance, Brazzaville, Asylum, The Bar on the corner of every region, Historia Novorum, Chinese Republic, Massachusetts, Capitalist Libertarian Freedom Region, Scandinavia, Gay Equality, Solid Kingdom, The Geometric Equanimity TGE, Philosophy 115, Australia, The Rose Garden, North Carolina, Polandball, The Graveyard, Armenia, Illinois, Thanksgiving, Autism Spectrum, Donald Trump Land, Nohbdy, Future Earth, Sweden, Knights of The Templar Order, KAISERREICH, Union of Free Nations, Regionless, The Free States, Bus Stop, Imperium of the Wolf, Union Mundial, International Debating Area, LCRUA, The Great Universe, Remnants of Hyrule, Etharia, United Alliances, The Three Kings, The Union of Religious Nations, Conaidhm na Cairde, Limbo, 1st Lutheran Christian Community, Octobris, The LCRUA, Gypsy Lands, The North Atlantic Ocean, The Alterran Republic, International sovereignty pact, Novo Brasil, Union of Allied States, Elparia, Brannackia, RHINIA, The Dawn of Unity, Yuno, Universal Pact, Union of Christian Nations, Kingdom Of Austria, Christian Nations Union, Union of Saxon Justice, Roman Byzantine Union, The Moderate Alliance, Federation of Allies, Northern Ocean, Conservicstan, nasunia, The International Polling Zone, Vermont, The House of Prayer, Dolla Holla, Valkia, The Labyrinth, Albosiac, Altay, United Christian Empires of the West, New Waldensia, The putnan empire of nations, Allied Conservative States, Turkic Union, Christian, Syria, United League of Nations, RAMS, Old Zealand, Markish Galactic Empire, Pecan Sandies, Bible Believers, Unitanda, Royal Federal Republic of Free States, Cambrian United Legacy, ThunderClan, Jafazia, The Three Isles, The Pangaean Union, Dominion of Cerberus, Cities of the World, Congress of Social Democratic Nations, Raxulan Empire, and Ecclesia Sancti Georgii.

Tags: Conservative, Democratic, Egalitarian, Enormous, Featured, General Assembly, Generalite, Independent, Issues Player, Map, Offsite Chat, Offsite Forums, and 4 others.Regional Government, Serious, Social, and World Assembly.

Regional Power: Moderate

Right to Life contains 133 nations, the 150th most in the world.

ActivityHistoryAdministration

Today's World Census Report

The Most Scientifically Advanced in Right to Life

World Census researchers quantified national scientific advancement by quizzing random citizens about quantum chromodynamics, space-time curvature and stem cell rejuvenation therapies. Responses based on Star Trek were discarded.

As a region, Right to Life is ranked 5,164th in the world for Most Scientifically Advanced.

NationWA CategoryMotto
1.The Dominion Technate of DontariaPsychotic Dictatorship“Blood, Iron, Dominion”
2.The Protectorate of Tudor AzarathIron Fist Consumerists“God save our great nation”
3.The Eternal Damnation of AlteranCorrupt Dictatorship“God of terror, very low dost Thou bring us”
4.The Power and Glory of DesecratonLeft-wing Utopia“I'm not into certainties, darling, only refreshments.”
5.The Kingdom of GrowiaInoffensive Centrist Democracy“United we stand”
6.The Misspeled Masterpeice of MichigainInoffensive Centrist Democracy“Victrix fortuna sapientia”
7.The Republic of PhydiosLiberal Democratic Socialists“Deus Est Princeps”
8.The Only of First And Only ArchiveDemocratic Socialists“Choose first.”
9.The Commonwealth of New KiwisNew York Times Democracy“Onward”
10.The Agrarian Distributist State of HavillandCorporate Bordello“♪When will there be a harvest for the world?♪”
1234. . .1314»

Regional Happenings

More...

Right to Life Regional Message Board

Roborian wrote:This is a much more micro-level issue, and it really is impossible to determine how much effect, if any, it had on the outcome, but this could be seen as some level of possible commentary on the rhetorical choices of the referendum, specifically 'Value Them Both' as a slogan.

Morally, I see no problem with the phrase at all, but strategically, I am somewhat skeptical of it. It seems to automatically put itself on the defensive, sort of assuming the argument that pro-lifers otherwise do not value women, and I think doing so makes it come off as weaker, feeling as if it is trying to deflect criticism rather than advance a cause. As a general rule, effective social movements win through boldness in rhetoric rather than moderation, and I think a direct focus on the issue itself is a better strategy.

I think you are quite correct in this. I remember the term "value them both", or something very near to it, was used in Ireland by the No campaign during the referendum on the 8th Amendment. More than anything it felt like a status quo remark, attempting to justify that everything was fine up to that point and no change was necessary, despite massive public concern to the contrary. It also offered nothing new to the debate than what was already there, while the Yes campaign offered a platform of change, something new, a solution to a perceived problem. This as we all know was the message that resonated with the people.

If the pro-life movement wants to win votes like this it needs to be radical in its messaging, offering a message of change rather than going back to the old.

The Catholic State of Eire, Culture of Life, and Aawia, The Pangaean Union has passed the treaty telegramed to you by a vote of 8 for, 0 against, and 2 abstaining. Hopefully you all will pass it too.

[center]The Pangaen Union-Right to Life Alliance [/center]

[center]Signed Month Day, 2022[/center]

Article I - Purpose of Treaty

(1.) The purpose of the alliance is to strengthen and build relations between The Pangaean Union and Right to Life, through means of both diplomatic and militaristic cooperation with one another.

Article II - Maintenance of Diplomatic Relations

(1.) Both The Pangaean Union and Right to Life shall maintain embassies and retain active ambassadors to each others region.

Article III - Military Cooperation

(1.) At any given time if either The Pangaean Union or Right to Life is at risk of attack through diplomatic or militaristic means, the region at risk may call upon the other for help. If done the region called upon must take actions as they can to help.

Article IV - Ratification

(1.) This treaty shall be ceremoniously signed by xx.

(2.) This treaty shall go into effect upon its ratification by both the Pangaean Union and Right to Life in accordance with each region's laws, standards, and traditions.

(3.) This treaty shall be in effect in perpetuity, until its repeal by one of the signatory regions; however, from time to time both regions may see fit to come together again and reaffirm or amend this treaty. The repeal of this treaty by one region shall immediately release the other region from its obligations.

Indiana Abolishes Abortion!

Excellent news. Indiana's legislature has passed a bill to ban abortions in the state.

According to the legislature's website, there are three exceptions:

  1. "the abortion is necessary to prevent any serious health risk of the pregnant woman or to save the pregnant woman's life;

  2. "the fetus is diagnosed with a lethal fetal anomaly; or

  3. "the pregnancy is a result of rape or incest."

http://iga.in.gov/legislative/2022ss1/bills/senate/1

Indiana has nine abortion providers, including six abortion clinics. Each year, about 7,000 to 8,000 abortions have been performed in the state.

Christian States of Arcopol wrote:God is Great! Say yes to life!

I just wish that conservatives would fight this hard to preserve life after birth. In most cases I feel like we say “protect the unborn! (But after that, who cares!)” and I don’t like that

Os Adoradores de Deus wrote:
I just wish that conservatives would fight this hard to preserve life after birth. In most cases I feel like we say “protect the unborn! (But after that, who cares!)” and I don’t like that

The vast majority of pro-life individuals also support various ways of helping struggling parents and their children.

The whole "after that, who cares!" part seems to be more propaganda than an actual belief.

Os Adoradores de Deus wrote:I just wish that conservatives would fight this hard to preserve life after birth. In most cases I feel like we say “protect the unborn! (But after that, who cares!)” and I don’t like that

That definitely exists in conservative and Republican circles. But it's not as if no one has or continues to advocate for dignified treatment of all human beings. This story came to mind:

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pro-abortion-democrat-tries-trolling-pro-lifers-by-requiring-dads-to-provide-for-moms-unborn-babies/

http://www.oklegislature.gov/BillInfo.aspx?Bill=HB3129&Session=2200&Tab=0

This guy proposed a bill that would require the father of an unborn child to pay up to 50% of the mother's pregnancy expenses. His reasoning was essentially, "If a woman is forced to carry an unwanted child, the father should also be forced to pay for it."

https://www.twitter.com/ForrestBennett/status/1484643409130397702

After the bill received enthusiastic support from pro-life organizations and criticism from abortion advocates, he issued a lengthy public apology and said he wouldn't be moving forward with the bill "as written". Since then, it has gone no further, and he has proposed no replacement. I guess there is no point in passing a bill to help vulnerable women if you can't use it to affirm your own beliefs. With Republican support, this bill might actually pass and empower more women to keep their babies. That would deal a blow to the abortion industry and anger your donors. Much better to just sweep it under the rug and assure everyone that you still support "abortion access" and that you've realized what a bad idea this bill was.

https://www.okhouse.gov/Members/District.aspx?District=92

https://www.twitter.com/ForrestBennett/status/1484950972480823304

Os Adoradores de Deus

More to the point, here's an article that you might like to read:
https://secularprolife.org/2022/06/responding-to-16-pro-choice-claims-about-dobbs-the-pro-life-movement-and-abortion-bans/

Phydios wrote:Os Adoradores de Deus

More to the point, here's an article that you might like to read:
https://secularprolife.org/2022/06/responding-to-16-pro-choice-claims-about-dobbs-the-pro-life-movement-and-abortion-bans/

Interesting

Phydios wrote:That definitely exists in conservative and Republican circles. But it's not as if no one has or continues to advocate for dignified treatment of all human beings. This story came to mind:

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pro-abortion-democrat-tries-trolling-pro-lifers-by-requiring-dads-to-provide-for-moms-unborn-babies/

http://www.oklegislature.gov/BillInfo.aspx?Bill=HB3129&Session=2200&Tab=0

This guy proposed a bill that would require the father of an unborn child to pay up to 50% of the mother's pregnancy expenses. His reasoning was essentially, "If a woman is forced to carry an unwanted child, the father should also be forced to pay for it."

https://www.twitter.com/ForrestBennett/status/1484643409130397702

After the bill received enthusiastic support from pro-life organizations and criticism from abortion advocates, he issued a lengthy public apology and said he wouldn't be moving forward with the bill "as written". Since then, it has gone no further, and he has proposed no replacement. I guess there is no point in passing a bill to help vulnerable women if you can't use it to affirm your own beliefs. With Republican support, this bill might actually pass and empower more women to keep their babies. That would deal a blow to the abortion industry and anger your donors. Much better to just sweep it under the rug and assure everyone that you still support "abortion access" and that you've realized what a bad idea this bill was.

https://www.okhouse.gov/Members/District.aspx?District=92

https://www.twitter.com/ForrestBennett/status/1484950972480823304

That’s actually kinda funny, in a sick way

Forum View

Advertisement