The Rejected RealmsBoard

Smatania wrote:

Says Mr. "I'm a puppet state for some fanatics who want to flood the world"

How the hell did you break the mind veil

_{also in my personal version of the story, etrea is a puppet of the authority rather than the ministry. the lord regent is dead or whatever}

Played too many video games today.
Really grabbed for a mouse that obviously wasn't there to try to look around.
Holy sigma I really am cooked.

Smatania wrote:

Your Joever

Holy joever really I am.

Land of bird wrote:

Nah, I’d rather live in Carrickfergus than a gulag. Truly surprising.

I’ll give credit where credit is due: Carrickfergus does have a Northern Irish manufactured WW2 Churchill tank in a car park and a Castle. But other than that it looks really run down. The only reason you’d want to go is for the castle. Which is why I went. Also the reason that I mentioned it is that it was the first run down place I could think of, and it was quite notable. There are way worse places here than Carrickfergus. I just thought of it first.

Inferior wrote:

Like the new WFE!

Wife?
I have no Wife

SPEAK, Dyllypoly!

Etrea wrote:

anti-communists when they realize that all economic ideologies suck and that anarchy is the only way to truly live happily

People when they realise that every ideology ever doesn't work because people are sometimes very naughty and the only way to be happy is to play the game a little bit, do some work, get a little lucky, and hope nothing tragic happens to you.

Etrea wrote:

anti-communists when they realize that all economic ideologies suck and that anarchy is the only way to truly live happily

so called anarchists when they read the works of malatesta and kropotkin only to find that they're so called "anti-communist" ideology is just a less dogmatic version of communism without doomsday prepping

Anarchy could work if people took what they needed, and settled disputes reasonably, but like I said, people are very naughty

United land of land wrote:

Anarchy could work if people took what they needed, and settled disputes reasonably, but like I said, people are very naughty

There needs to be one leader, a master which the people must obey.

United land of land wrote:

And who's to say he won't be naughty, or who gets to be the leader in the first place?

Why are you questioning the leader? This is exactly the problem we are trying to solve