IndiaBoard

Sabhapati rajya wrote:

Dear nations,

Please give your opinions on the recent bill tabled by Trivian in India Parliament House. Your opinion matters a lot.

Constitutional Amendment Bill -1

by Trivian

Article - 1

Add - Section 9

Section 9 States

Any W.A Delegate who has held Office for Two Consecutive Terms cannot stand for W.A Elections for a Direct Third Electorial Session. A Nation can stand for Re- Election to Third Term after a Term finished by another Nation as to maintain the Power Neutrality Convention.

Read factbook

I can't post there but I agree with Hindu mahasabha that this amendment would limit democracy rather than uphold it. The Delegate position is not one that any nation can or would do well and a talented delegate is a good hallmark of a strong region. Losing a good delegate that has the support of the electorate just to comply with a term limit seems nonsensical to me.

Hindu mahasabha wrote:

Foreign Ministry Notification:

It has come to our notice that the region, Glorious Nations Of Iwaku has certain elements of Fascism being entertained in their region, the prime example being, the word 'Fascist' in the name of their Founder.

Further, it has come to my notice, that the citizens had disrespected our Hon'ble member Indusse a few days ago on their RMB. The Government of Iwaku too was reluctant to take any action.

Further, our regions don't share a much diplomatic/friendly ties, therefore the Foreign Ministry is considering to close embassies with them, before waiting for a short span of time to gain inputs from a couple of nations.

Cc:Hindu puri
Awell islands

Yes, embassies must be closed.
They have no diplomatic importance with us anyways and so it should be closed at the earliest as we don’t need that kind of stuff in India.

Hey guys this is bad!!! nations like vaetmar and me who arent part of the adminstration are not able to post in the parliament rmb. i request you to change it asap.

Trivian wrote:

I understand the concern raised by Honourable Member of the Region .But Let us clear that Region of India has quite Good amount of Supporters from I.D.F Party. This mean that the chances of electing Hindu Puri is always on Higher Side. This would ultimately lead to a One Party System Functionary Just Like in China and morever someday some Members might feel that the Democratic Assertions are being Curtailed.
I haven't said that A Nation can't stand for Re- Elections but only after a Term finished by another Nation that means For Eg Awell islands can be nominated for a Proxy from I.D.F Party or whoever wins the Election can lead the W.A Delegacy.
Hindu Puri can stand for next two consecutive Elections after that Substitute Period.

1.IDF and BJS has equal number of supporters.

2. If IDF has really large number of supporters, then no matter who the candidate is IDF will again win the election, leading to your one party theory.

3. WAD Elections are different from normal elections, they are carried out via endorsements and only WA Nations are eligible for it, further WAD Elections are not party based elections.

Trivian wrote:

I understand the concern raised by Honourable Member of the Region .But Let us clear that Region of India has quite Good amount of Supporters from I.D.F Party. This mean that the chances of electing Hindu Puri is always on Higher Side. This would ultimately lead to a One Party System Functionary Just Like in China and morever someday some Members might feel that the Democratic Assertions are being Curtailed.
I haven't said that A Nation can't stand for Re- Elections but only after a Term finished by another Nation that means For Eg Awell islands can be nominated for a Proxy from I.D.F Party or whoever wins the Election can lead the W.A Delegacy.
Hindu Puri can stand for next two consecutive Elections after that Substitute Period.

WAD Elections are not party based.

The WAD elections are not party based election. Not only that currently Awell islands has just 2 endorsement's less than hindu puri which shows that awell has chance to be the next WAD and i think that there can be more than 2 candidates in total. i.e. from I.D.F. whole india is also standing in WAD elections so,this election can witness more than 2 candidates from same party.

Trivian wrote:

I understand the concern raised by Honourable Member of the Region .But Let us clear that Region of India has quite Good amount of Supporters from I.D.F Party. This mean that the chances of electing Hindu Puri is always on Higher Side. This would ultimately lead to a One Party System Functionary Just Like in China and morever someday some Members might feel that the Democratic Assertions are being Curtailed.
I haven't said that A Nation can't stand for Re- Elections but only after a Term finished by another Nation that means For Eg Awell islands can be nominated for a Proxy from I.D.F Party or whoever wins the Election can lead the W.A Delegacy.
Hindu Puri can stand for next two consecutive Elections after that Substitute Period.

I actually support this now that you explain it this way. I support this bill. It leads to a better democracy as well which is always my goal. That way, new idea should and views can come into India and it is basically like term limits.

Awell islands wrote:

Actually, yes they are as decided in the past.
But independent people are also allowed.

I am totally against party based elections. WAD elections will be available only through endorsements not polls and if party based elections with polls continue i am anyway gonna boycott this election.

Awell islands wrote:

I actually support this now that you explain it this way. I support this bill. It leads to a better democracy as well which is always my goal. That way, new idea should and views can come into India and it is basically like term limits.

But again, we cannot really have control over it, as the law is set by Nirupama, any WA Nation (Citizen) can fight elections as many times he likes.

So it is in vain to discuss the Bill.

i am making my view clear. i agree with trivians bill but, there cannot be any party based elections for WAD.

Indusse wrote:

i am making my view clear. i agree with trivians bill but, there cannot be any party based elections for WAD.

Fine I agree with this then.
All WAD elections must not be party based