by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Thaecia Board

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .777778779780

The Islamic Country of Honour wrote:And Pendors had complained to me some days ago about it, so I felt I should raise the matter. I clearly mentioned that I am not criticising others in the first post. I would like to reiterate Brototh and Islonia’s great job in the RMB and I request them to take Pendors back

Brototh wrote:As stated, I would have been fine with letting Pendors back -- but his behaviour in the RP and towards the RP is completely unacceptable and he clearly doesn't show any signs of stopping soon.

If I may suggest as Independent observer with no real knowledge about it.

Maybe the Justice Departement should have a look at the issue and give advice to the RP Secretary.

Wherafter the RP Secretary or his Deputy can make a decision about the issue. Following or declining the advice of the JM.

Afterwards both parties still have the opportunity to go through court if someone is still unsatisfied. Where a final decision will be enforced.

Levantx wrote:

If I may suggest as Independent observer with no real knowledge about it.

Maybe the Justice Department should have a look at the issue and give advice to the RP Secretary.

Wherafter the RP Secretary or his Deputy can make a decision about the issue. Following or declining the advice of the JM.

Afterwards both parties still have the opportunity to go through court if someone is still unsatisfied. Where a final decision will be enforced.

An excellent idea. But to be honest, I feel as though an intervention is not necessary against someone who has been blatantly toxic without much evidence against it. There isn't really much opportunity for debate here, because I would be surprised if someone could come up with me directly being rude to Pendors ooc. I won't deny IC, I was rude to him, but this was RP -- my country acted aggressively to his by using a false flag to try and take over one of his islands.

If Pendors' decides to defame us and now heeds your words and decides to go to court, I'll honestly be quite surprised if he wins..

Brototh wrote:As stated, I would have been fine with letting Pendors back -- but his behaviour in the RP and towards the RP is completely unacceptable and he clearly doesn't show any signs of stopping soon.

But you're not telling what you did. First of all Everyone started to Gang up on me. And then you started insulting me and so i insulted you back and then everyone started calling me out and then after all of this you called me toxic. Not to mention the time you warned me because you didn't see when i spammed which i have been warned on that before you warned me, which means you warned me 1 time for no reason. And also, People always don't give a crap about you doing stuff to the RP. You are changing the RP to your own gain. And then when i rejoined the RP you banned me for literally no reason at all. And also calling my behaviour "unacceptable" is a lie. As debates happends and you seems to take it into your heart.

I'll admit i wasen't 100% Good at this but i just want to say please be less aggressive. We can both learn from this.

Brototh wrote:An excellent idea. But .....

Well the investigation shall not intervene in the IC Roleplay part, as that is up to the Roleplayers to decide.
However if I understood it correctly Pendors has been banned from the Roleplay. the JM and or the Court can look into that. Was it a valid reason to ban someone from the Roleplay or not? Is the ban a proportional reaction? AND OR maybe other constructive advice to Roleplay(ers) in matters of toxicity.

What IC happens is not the JM and or Court concerns, however around the Roleplay OOC and the admin team, is under the oversight of both the Secretary (and the government).

I think it can be an added value, so that toxicity and meaningless debate OOC about the issue can be prevented. Of course I am making the suggestion, it is up to the RP secretary Islonia and JM Deppendants to set it in motion if they want to.

Levantx wrote:Well the investigation shall not intervene in the IC Roleplay part, as that is up to the Roleplayers to decide.
However if I understood it correctly Pendors has been banned from the Roleplay. the JM and or the Court can look into that. Was it a valid reason to ban someone from the Roleplay or not? Is the ban a proportional reaction? AND OR maybe other constructive advice to Roleplay(ers) in matters of toxicity.

What IC happens is not the JM and or Court concerns, however around the Roleplay OOC and the admin team, is under the oversight of both the Secretary (and the government).

I think it can be an added value, so that toxicity and meaningless debate OOC about the issue can be prevented. Of course I am making the suggestion, it is up to the RP secretary Islonia and JM Deppendants to set it in motion if they want to.

I think you're absolutely on the money on this issue. IC issues are not under the purview of the justice ministry, but OOC/meta issues such as being banned from the RP are. Now, whether or not Pendors is justified in his complaint is another matter entirely, but in my opinion, yes, he should at the very least be able to file a suit for it.

Plus, it's content for the judicial branch. Let's be real, people, we need to give our attorneys/public defenders/Justices something to do.

Thaecian Polling Institute: Weekly Party Support Poll

Current Polling:

  • Thaecian Progressive Union (TPU): 29% (- 1%)

  • Unity Party of Thaecia (UNI): 26% (- 3%)

  • Phoenix Coalition of Thaecia (PCT): 22% (+ 3%)

  • Thaecian Action Party (TAP): 17% (+ 1%)

  • The Alternative (ALT): 6% (0%)

You can check our full graph here: https://sites.google.com/view/thaecianpartiesovertime/home-page

This week's polling shows record low numbers for both the TPU and Unity parties, while record high numbers for the PCT and TAP. Lack of effort into recruitment is what is believed to be hurting the two main parties.

«12. . .777778779780

Advertisement