by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .1,0621,0631,0641,0651,0661,0671,068. . .2,0952,096»

Onofria wrote:Anarcho Pacifism

Any thoughts?

Impossible utopia. Even more utopian than other forms of anarchy.

Neo-trinity

Xsyco wrote:A lawless wasteland...

Just like humanity was a lawless wasteland before the advent of human governments.

Oh. Wait.

The united provinces of north america

Khomney wrote:Just like humanity was a lawless wasteland before the advent of human governments.

Oh. Wait.

Government has always been around. Family = Family government, rules of your household. https://youtu.be/SvbTFwXagdQ

Neo-trinity

Khomney wrote:i want to know what you think anarchy is

Initial coexistence followed by increased tensions and the inevitable formation of factions. said factions tear each other apart and innocents get stuck in the middle. Innocents turn to violence out of last resort.

One faction or group of factions reigns supreme and guess what, some form of government is back. If no faction manages to claim the throne the land devolves into a lawless wasteland

The united provinces of north america

The united provinces of north america wrote:I don't think they will pass up a lot of money.

In my opinion, we should pay off some of the national debt before we even think about spending that much money on Greenland

The united provinces of north america and Asthrer

The united provinces of north america wrote:Government has always been around. Family = Family government, rules of your household. https://youtu.be/SvbTFwXagdQ

Sure. I suppose you can say that. Anarchy in the sense that it's defined today doesn't dissolve family governments

The united provinces of north america

I think I might move to the New Western Wmpire region. What do you guys think?

Post self-deleted by Asthrer.

Asthrer wrote:That makes no sense, the government is not your family, it's just a bureaucratic machine that spies on your Google searches, which is a violation of your right to privacy and its own constitution.

The government must be dwarf and should not steal your money that you earned by working honestly, in fact, no matter how much you want to "help" it will not succeed, only a corporate will do so because if it does not it would be uneconomic.

I remember hearing a phrase from an Austrian economist: “The bureaucracy exists because there are problems, if there are no problems there is no bureaucracy, so the bureaucracy is the only one interested in generating problems to justify its existence.”

That is the problem of "economic calculation" @The United Provinces of North America

Asthrer wrote:

What I want to say is that the state must exist to keep the corporate and the population under control but it should only be in charge of justice because if it is privatized the anarchist nation will suffer from a total fall of freedom.

The united provinces of north america

Asthrer wrote:What I want to say is that the state must exist to keep the corporate and the population under control but it should only be in charge of justice because if it is privatized the anarchist nation will suffer from a total fall of freedom.

How many times do you have to quote/talk to yourself, and what's the problem with freedom? Misread his freedom comment.

The united provinces of north america

Asthrer wrote:

Family = Family government. Makes perfect sense, school government, church government, a social club, a community, or a labor union.

The united provinces of north america wrote:How many times do you have to quote/talk to yourself, and what's the problem with freedom?

Sorry, I have never investigated the issue of the board thoroughly, because I only solve problems and ignore what they say on the board; in short, what I want to say is that there must be a state to keep corporate and inhabitants at bay but it must be small and it must only take action in justice, the rest will be resolved by corporate and residents.

The state should not take care of another matter as it will fail relentlessly, this has already been explained by Hayek; This problem is called the economic calculation failure.

The united provinces of north america wrote:Family = Family government. Makes perfect sense, school government, church government, a social club, a community, or a labor union.

What do you mean?

The united provinces of north america

Asthrer wrote:Sorry, I have never investigated the issue of the board thoroughly, because I only solve problems and ignore what they say on the board; in short, what I want to say is that there must be a state to keep corporate and inhabitants at bay but it must be small and it must only take action in justice, the rest will be resolved by corporate and residents.

The state should not take care of another matter as it will fail relentlessly, this has already been explained by Hayek; This problem is called the economic calculation failure.

Anarchist believe eliminating all public government and little to no functional jurisdiction.

The united provinces of north america

Asthrer wrote:What do you mean?

Those are all types of governments.

Khomney wrote:Just like humanity was a lawless wasteland before the advent of human governments.

Oh. Wait.

a) It was a joke
b) Look how many long wars there were back then
c) People were more concerned with finding food to kill others

Xsyco wrote:a) It was a joke
b) Look how many long wars there were back then
c) People were more concerned with finding food to kill others

Actually we are living in the most peaceful Time ever right now! It has never been so easy to live as it is today. And I'm talking about all of humanity in general. We have very low violence if you compare it to the past. And there are no wars between whole states right now which greatly reduces death tolls. Many nations strive for cooperation. Developing countries are developing at a fast pace even if we don't get to know a lot about it.
Do you want to live in the past?

Xsyco and The united provinces of north america

The united provinces of north america

Xsyco wrote:a) It was a joke
b) Look how many long wars there were back then
c) People were more concerned with finding food to kill others

That's why I linked that video.

The united provinces of north america wrote:That's why I linked that video.

One can also link this video by kurzgesagt:
https://youtu.be/NbuUW9i-mHs

The united provinces of north america

Emaha wrote:One can also link this video by kurzgesagt:
https://youtu.be/NbuUW9i-mHs

Looks like a major conflict is looming over Pakistan and India, over the Jammu and Kashmir border. Tensions have been building since 1947.

The united provinces of north america wrote:Looks like a major conflict is looming over Pakistan and India, over the Jammu and Kashmir border. Tensions have been building since 1947.

Tensions keep coming and going there. There have been already 4 wars and maybe there will be more in the future. Let's hope for the best.

The united provinces of north america

The united provinces of north america

I like to think this is how the FNR would operate if it where a store, that is! https://youtu.be/yUaCQnljVmY

The united provinces of north america

Emaha wrote:Tensions keep coming and going there. There have been already 4 wars and maybe there will be more in the future. Let's hope for the best.

Hopefully peace resolves, since my friend from India told me about it.

Xsyco

«12. . .1,0621,0631,0641,0651,0661,0671,068. . .2,0952,096»

Advertisement