As you correctly identify in your ruling, the law at no point prohibits me from standing. I would like to bring attention to multiple aspects of this ruling:
1- The Dual Citizen Act, which reads: Dual citizens shall be prohibited from concurrently holding an elected or appointed office, or holding direct power over the given office, in another region
It does, in fact, specify that I cannot hold office in both. Standing, whilst indicating my desire to have the office of MGA, does not in itself mean I hold 2 offices, meaning I am legally compliant. Nowhere in law does it say a candidate cannot have a position elsewhere. I would ask the court to follow the word of the law when making its decisions.
2- Section 2C of the Elections Act, which reads: All electoral citizens shall be eligible to nominate for the General Assembly
I ask the court, am I not an electoral citizen? Does this very law, the central post of our great democracies elections in any way prevent me from standing? I will answer for you- it does not.
3- At no point was I, the disenfranchised citizen of TLA, asked about my intent. I was not present nor even informed there was a legal case against my standing for Member of General Assembly.
It is for these 3 reasons that I formally request my removal be reconsidered and rectified. I fully intend to stand for office, and do so in full compliance of The Leftist Assembly's Laws.